Sheperd Vs. New York

Sheperd vs New York

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-12-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101613

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101613
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-12-1967
Case Number: 388 U.S. 444
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheperd

Respondent

New York

Excerpt

sheperd v. new york - 388 u.s. 444 (1967) u.s. supreme court sheperd v. new york, 388 u.s. 444 (1967) 388 u.s. 444 sheperd et al. v. new york. on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate term of the supreme court of new york, first judicial department. no. 26. decided june 12, 1967. certiorari granted; reversed. ira h. holley and eugene gressman for petitioners. frank s. hogan for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the appellate term of the supreme court of new york, first judicial department, is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . the chief justice and mr. justice clark would affirm. mishkin v. new york, 383 u.s. 502 . mr. justice harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , and memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. page 388 u.s. 444, 445

Full Judgment

SHEPERD v. NEW YORK - 388 U.S. 444 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court SHEPERD v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 444 (1967) 388 U.S. 444

SHEPERD ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME
COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 26.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioners.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE CLARK would affirm. Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. 502 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 444, 445

Same Parties Sheperd vs New York Same Subject Land Acquisition