Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Friedman Vs. New York

Friedman vs New York

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-12-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101610

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
388 U.S. 441
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Friedman

Respondent

New York

Excerpt

friedman v. new york - 388 u.s. 441 (1967) u.s. supreme court friedman v. new york, 388 u.s. 441 (1967) 388 u.s. 441 friedman v. new york. on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate term of the supreme court of new york, first judicial department. no. 7. decided june 12, 1967. certiorari granted; reversed. ira h. holley and eugene gressman for petitioner. frank s. hogan for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the appellate term of the supreme court of new york, first judicial department, is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . mr. justice harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , and memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. page 388 u.s. 441, 442

Full Judgment

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK - 388 U.S. 441 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 441 (1967) 388 U.S. 441

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME
COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 7.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 441, 442



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial