Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Tannenbaum Vs. New York

Tannenbaum vs New York

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-12-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101608

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
388 U.S. 439
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tannenbaum

Respondent

New York

Excerpt

tannenbaum v. new york - 388 u.s. 439 (1967) u.s. supreme court tannenbaum v. new york, 388 u.s. 439 (1967) 388 u.s. 439 tannenbaum v. new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 993. decided june 12, 1967. 18 n. y. 2d 268, 220 n. e. 2d 783, appeal dismissed. osmond k. fraenkel and stanley fleishman for appellant. frank s. hogan for appellee. horace s. manges for the american book publishers council, inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot. mr. justice brennan would reverse the judgment of the lower court. mr. chief justice warren, dissenting. i dissent from the dismissal of this appeal as moot for the reasons stated in my dissent in jacobs v. new york, ante, p. 431. in my view, the question presented by this case is extremely important and requires a decision on the merits by this court. i would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. mr. justice douglas dissents. (see dissent set forth in jacobs v. new york, ante, at 436.) page 388 u.s. 439, 440

Full Judgment

TANNENBAUM v. NEW YORK - 388 U.S. 439 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court TANNENBAUM v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 439 (1967) 388 U.S. 439

TANNENBAUM v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 993.
Decided June 12, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 268, 220 N. E. 2d 783, appeal dismissed.

Osmond K. Fraenkel and Stanley Fleishman for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

Horace S. Manges for the American Book Publishers Council, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would reverse the judgment of the lower court.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN, dissenting.

I dissent from the dismissal of this appeal as moot for the reasons stated in my dissent in Jacobs v. New York, ante, p. 431. In my view, the question presented by this case is extremely important and requires a decision on the merits by this Court. I would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. (See dissent set forth in Jacobs v. New York, ante, at 436.)

Page 388 U.S. 439, 440



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial