Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wilson Vs. State

Wilson vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 25, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015891

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wilson

Respondent

State

Excerpt

in the high court of keralaaternakulam present: the honourable mr. justice b.kemal pasha thursday, the 25th dayof july 2013 3rd sravana, 1935 crl.rev.pet.no. 1541 of 2002 ( ) --------------------------------- against the judgment in cra 59/1998 of additional district and sessions court (adhoc i), thodupuzha dated 27 09-2002 against the judgment in cc 56/1995 of j.m.f.c.,adimali dated31-03-1998 revision petitioners/apppellants/accused: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. wilson,s/o.chacko, kavalamkuzhiyil veedu, panniyarkutty kara konnathadi village.2. jiji,s/o.george,chengandayil veedu, panniyarkutty kara, konnathadi village. by adv.sri.t.v.prabhakaran respondent/respondent/complainant: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- state of kerala-represented by the public prosecutor, high court of, kerala ernakulam (crime no.194/94 of vellathooval police station - c.c.no.56/95) r by public prosecutor sri.sreejith.v.s this criminal revision petition having been finally heard on 25-07-2013, the court on the same daypassed the following: av b. kemal pasha, j ------------------------------------ crl.r.p. no. 1541 of 2002 ----------------------------------- dated this the 25th day of july, 2013 order when this matter come up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. last time also there was no representation and consequently, today it stands, posted for hearing as last chance. as the petitioners are not interested, this crl.r.p is dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- b. kemal pasha, judge av /true copy/ p.a to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAATERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAYOF JULY 2013 3RD SRAVANA, 1935 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1541 of 2002 ( ) --------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRA 59/1998 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC I), THODUPUZHA DATED 27 09-2002 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 56/1995 of J.M.F.C.,ADIMALI DATED31-03-1998 REVISION PETITIONERS/APPPELLANTS/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. WILSON,S/O.CHACKO, KAVALAMKUZHIYIL VEEDU, PANNIYARKUTTY KARA KONNATHADI VILLAGE.

2. JIJI,S/O.GEORGE,CHENGANDAYIL VEEDU, PANNIYARKUTTY KARA, KONNATHADI VILLAGE. BY ADV.SRI.T.V.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF, KERALA ERNAKULAM (CRIME NO.194/94 OF VELLATHOOVAL POLICE STATION - C.C.NO.56/95) R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SREEJITH.V.S THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYPASSED THE FOLLOWING: AV B. KEMAL PASHA, J ------------------------------------ Crl.R.P. No. 1541 of 2002 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2013 ORDER

When this matter come up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. Last time also there was no representation and consequently, today it stands, posted for hearing as last chance. As the petitioners are not interested, this Crl.R.P is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE AV /True Copy/ P.A to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial