Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Carp Vs. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry

Carp vs Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-23-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101571

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
389 U.S. 52
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Carp

Respondent

Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry

Excerpt

carp v. texas state board of examiners in optometry - 389 u.s. 52 (1967) u.s. supreme court carp v. texas state board of examiners in optometry, 389 u.s. 52 (1967) 389 u.s. 52 carp et al. v. texas state board of examiners in optometry et al. appeal from the supreme court of texas. no. 481. decided october 23, 1967. 412 s. w. 2d 307, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. thurman arnold, robert e. herzstein, douglas e. bergman, quentin keith and price daniel for appellants. crawford c. martin, attorney general of texas, george m. cowden, first assistant attorney general, j. c. davis and john reeves, assistant attorneys general, will garwood and tom gee, special assistant attorneys general, and a. j. carubbi, jr., for appellee texas state board of examiners in optometry, and ellis lyons, bennett boskey, charles m. babb and mark martin for other appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 389 u.s. 52, 53

Full Judgment

CARP v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY - 389 U.S. 52 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court CARP v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY, 389 U.S. 52 (1967) 389 U.S. 52

CARP ET AL. v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 481.
Decided October 23, 1967.

412 S. W. 2d 307, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thurman Arnold, Robert E. Herzstein, Douglas E. Bergman, Quentin Keith and Price Daniel for appellants.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, J. C. Davis and John Reeves, Assistant Attorneys General, Will Garwood and Tom Gee, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellee Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry, and Ellis Lyons, Bennett Boskey, Charles M. Babb and Mark Martin for other appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 52, 53



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial