Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Garber Vs. Kansas

Garber vs Kansas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-23-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101570

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
389 U.S. 51
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Garber

Respondent

Kansas

Excerpt

garber v. kansas - 389 u.s. 51 (1967) u.s. supreme court garber v. kansas, 389 u.s. 51 (1967) 389 u.s. 51 garber v. kansas. appeal from the supreme court of kansas. no. 393. decided october 23, 1967. 197 kan. 567, 419 p.2d 896, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. marvin m. karpatkin, e. dexter galloway and melvin l. wulf for appellant. robert c. londerholm, attorney general of kansas, and j. richard foth, assistant attorney general, for appellee. leo pfeffer for the national committee for amish religious freedom, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. the chief justice, mr. justice douglas, and mr. justice fortas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 389 u.s. 51, 52

Full Judgment

GARBER v. KANSAS - 389 U.S. 51 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court GARBER v. KANSAS, 389 U.S. 51 (1967) 389 U.S. 51

GARBER v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 393.
Decided October 23, 1967.

197 Kan. 567, 419 P.2d 896, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Marvin M. Karpatkin, E. Dexter Galloway and Melvin L. Wulf for appellant.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Leo Pfeffer for the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 51, 52



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial