Chance Vs. California

Chance vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-06-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101560

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101560
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Nov-06-1967
Case Number: 389 U.S. 89
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chance

Respondent

California

Excerpt

chance v. california - 389 u.s. 89 (1967) u.s. supreme court chance v. california, 389 u.s. 89 (1967) 389 u.s. 89 chance v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the superior court of california, county of san mateo. no. 306, misc. decided november 6, 1967. certiorari granted; judgment reversed. marshall w. krause for petitioner. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, and robert r. granucci and michael j. phelan, deputy attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . mr. justice harlan would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 . page 389 u.s. 89, 90

Full Judgment

CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA - 389 U.S. 89 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 89 (1967) 389 U.S. 89

CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. No. 306, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1967.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Marshall W. Krause for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Michael J. Phelan, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 .

Page 389 U.S. 89, 90

Same Parties Chance vs California Same Subject Criminal