Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Basheer Vs. State of Kerala

Basheer vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015465

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Basheer

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice p.bhavadasan wednesday, the 30th day of january 2013 10th magha 193 bail appl..no. 493 of 2013 () ----------------------------- crime no. 696/2011 of mathilakom police station , thrissur ..... petitioner/2nd accused(s): ----------------------------------------------- basheer, aged 2 years, s/o.abdul rahiman,pathiyassery house,moonnupeedika, perinjanam p.o,perinjanam village,kodungallur taluk, thrissur district. by advs.sri.babu karukapadath smt.m.a.vaheeda babu sri.k.a.noushad sri.p.g.pramod sri.kandampully rahul respondent/complainant(s): --------------------------------------------------- state of kerala, represented by sub-inspector of police, mathilakom police station, through public prosecutor, high court of kerala,ernakulam. by public prosecutor smt. laliza t.y. this bail application having come up for admission on 30-01-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: kss p. bhavadasan, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b.a. no. 493 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 30th day of january, 2013. order it is seen that non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner. in which case, the question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise for consideration. this application is therefore dismissed. however, if the petitioner is so advised, he may surrender before the court concerned, and if he moves necessary applications, the said court shall dispose of the same in accordance with law, preferably on the date of surrender itself. p. bhavadasan, judge sb.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 493 of 2013 () ----------------------------- CRIME NO. 696/2011 OF MATHILAKOM POLICE STATION , THRISSUR ..... PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED(S): ----------------------------------------------- BASHEER, AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN,PATHIYASSERY HOUSE,MOONNUPEEDIKA, PERINJANAM P.O,PERINJANAM VILLAGE,KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.G.PRAMOD SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): --------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHILAKOM POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA T.Y. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P. BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No. 493 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30th day of January, 2013. ORDER It is seen that non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner. In which case, the question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise for consideration. This application is therefore dismissed. However, if the petitioner is so advised, he may surrender before the court concerned, and if he moves necessary applications, the said court shall dispose of the same in accordance with law, preferably on the date of surrender itself. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial