Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Baiju Vs. State of Kerala

Baiju vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015428

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Baiju

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice. p.s.gopinathan wednesday, the 30th day of january 2013 10th magha 193 crl.rev.pet.no. 1366 of 2002 ( ) ------------------------------- against the judgment in cra.110/1999 of addl.sessions judge (adhoc-i), (fast track), alappuzha dated 29 6.2003 against the judgment in sc.23/1998 of principal assistant sessions court,alappuzha dated 31 03-1999 revision petitioner(s)/2nd appellant/2nd accused: ------------------------------------------------- laiju s/o. kunju kunju, kombathan parambil veedu,eravukadu ward,alappuzha. by adv. sri.s.sanal kumar complainant(s)/respondent/complainant: --------------------------------------- state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor,high court of kerala,ernakulam. by public prosecutor sri. n. suresh this criminal revision petition having been finally heard on 30-01-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: p.s. gopinathan, j....................................................... crl.r.p.no.1366 of 200....................................................... dated this the 30th day of january, 2013 order this is a petition preferred by the 2nd accused in s.c.no.23/1998 on the file of the additional sessions judge, adhoc-i, alappuzha. the revision petitioner was reported dead. the prosecution was directed to verify and submit. the learned government pleader would submit that the factum of death is true as reported by the investigating officer. therefore, this petition is dismissed as abated. return the lower court records forthwith. sd/- p.s. gopinathan, judge. cl /true copy/ p.s. to judge. :2. p.s. gopinathan, j.............................................. crl.r.p.no.1366 of 200.......................................... 30th day of january, 2013 order :3.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1366 of 2002 ( ) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRA.110/1999 of ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE (ADHOC-I), (FAST TRACK), ALAPPUZHA DATED 29 6.2003 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SC.23/1998 of PRINCIPAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT,ALAPPUZHA DATED 31 03-1999 REVISION PETITIONER(S)/2ND APPELLANT/2ND ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------- LAIJU S/O. KUNJU KUNJU, KOMBATHAN PARAMBIL VEEDU,ERAVUKADU WARD,ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR COMPLAINANT(S)/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. N. SURESH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S. GOPINATHAN, J.

...................................................... Crl.R.P.NO.1366 OF 200....................................................... Dated this the 30th day of January, 2013 ORDER

This is a petition preferred by the 2nd accused in S.C.No.23/1998 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Adhoc-I, Alappuzha. The revision petitioner was reported dead. The prosecution was directed to verify and submit. The learned Government Pleader would submit that the factum of death is true as reported by the investigating officer. Therefore, this petition is dismissed as abated. Return the lower court records forthwith. Sd/- P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. cl /true copy/ P.S. to Judge. :

2. P.S. GOPINATHAN, J.

............................................. Crl.R.P.NO.1366 OF 200.......................................... 30th day of January, 2013 ORDER

:

3.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial