Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sony Philip Vs. the Regional

Sony Philip vs The Regional

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015424

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sony Philip

Respondent

The Regional

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh wednesday, the 30th day of january 2013 10th magha 193 wp(c).no. 2843 of 2013 (e) -------------------------- petitioner(s): ------------------------ sony philip, s/o.sabu philip, kaienadathu house, valakuzhi p.o., mallappally. by adv. sri.o.d.sivadas. respondent(s): ------------------------- 1. regional transport authority, pathanamthitta”645. represented by its secretary.2. the secretary, the regional transport authority, pathanamthitta”645. by govt. pleader mr.rafeek v.k. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: rs. wp(c).no. 2843 of 2013 (e) appendix petitioner's exhibits:- ext. p1 true copy of the application for regular permit submitted by the petitioner dated 26 11-2012. ext. p2 true copy of the application for temporary permit dated 21 01-2013 submitted by the petitioner and chelan. ext. p3 true copy of the letter submitted to the 2nd respondent by the grama panchayath dated 23 01-2013. respondent's exhibits:- nil. //true copy// p.a. to judge rs. v.chitambaresh,j.= = = = = = = = = = = w.p.(c) no.2843 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = dated this the 30th day of january, 2013 judgment ext.p1 is the application for regular permit put in by the petitioner to operate the stage carriage service on the route mallappally-chungapara. i direct the first respondent regional transport authority to consider ext.p1 application in the next meeting convened for the purpose.2. ext.p2 is the application for temporary permit put in by the petitioner to operate on the same route. ext.p3 is the request of the ezhumattoor grama panchayath indicating the existence of a temporary need. the petitioner also points out that cherukolpuzha hindu religious convention and maramon convention are to start shortly.3. i direct the second respondent to consider ext.p2 application for temporary permit within a perio

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 2843 of 2013 (E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SONY PHILIP, S/O.SABU PHILIP, KAIENADATHU HOUSE, VALAKUZHI P.O., MALLAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA”

645. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA”

645. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.RAFEEK V.K. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. WP(C).No. 2843 of 2013 (E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULAR PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 26 11-2012. EXT. P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT DATED 21 01-2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND CHELAN. EXT. P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 23 01-2013. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs. V.CHITAMBARESH,J.

= = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.2843 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 30th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT

Ext.P1 is the application for regular permit put in by the petitioner to operate the stage carriage service on the route Mallappally-Chungapara. I direct the first respondent Regional Transport Authority to consider Ext.P1 application in the next meeting convened for the purpose.

2. Ext.P2 is the application for temporary permit put in by the petitioner to operate on the same route. Ext.P3 is the request of the Ezhumattoor Grama Panchayath indicating the existence of a temporary need. The petitioner also points out that Cherukolpuzha Hindu Religious Convention and Maramon Convention are to start shortly.

3. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P2 application for temporary permit within a period one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Any other application pending for temporary permit to operate on the same route shall also be considered along with Ext.P2 application. The Writ Petition (Civil) is disposed of. smm V.CHITAMBARESH. JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial