Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Leela Devi Antharjanam Vs. the Travancore Devaswom Board

Leela Devi Antharjanam vs The Travancore Devaswom Board

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015372

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Leela Devi Antharjanam

Respondent

The Travancore Devaswom Board

Excerpt

.....leela devi antharjanam aged 6 years w/o.vishnu bhattathiri,kizhakke pullamvazhy illom harippad by adv. sri.c.m.mohammed iquabal respondent(s): -------------------------- 1. the travancore devaswom board nanthancode p.o,thiruvananthapuram,rep.by secretary 2 krishnan nambootiri kizhakkepullamvazhi illam,harippad 3 nangayya antharjaman d/o.umadevi antharjanam,pahzyadath madom kurattikkadu muri,mannar 4 umadevi antharjanam d/o.umadevi antharjanam,mundakkal madathil cherukole muri,cherukole village,kozhencherry 5 subdra antharjanam d/o.umadevi antharjanam,parazhivettathumana vengoor p.o.,angamaly 6 sreekumari antharjanam d/o.umadevi antharjanam kizhakkepullam vazhi illom pilappuzha muri,harippad village. o.p(c) no.400 of 201.7. subrahmanyan nambpoothiri @ thuppan namboothiri s/o.krishnan namboothiri,kizhakkepullamavzhi illam pilappuzha muri ,harippad village 8 s.sreekumar s/o.savithri antharjanam,house no 3.34.501(500a)akshara,pdivattom,edappally p.o. ernakulam.9. s.harikumar s/o.savithri antharjanam new no 15(old no 51/12)kamaraj avenue,2nd street adiyar,madras-600020 10. s.chandrikadevi d/o.savithri antharjanam,madasseri mana karukandam post,kothamangalam,moovattupuzha 11 s.sukumaran bhattathiri house no 34,34/501(500a)akshara,pdivattom edappally p.o.,ernakulam r by sri.p.gopal this op (civil) having come up for admission on 30-01-2013 along with o.p(c) no.407 of 2013.the court on the same day delivered the following: o.p(c) no.400 of 201.appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits: exhibit p1 the true copy of judgment dated 12 4.2012 in o.s.no.205 of 200.of the sub court, mavelikkara. exhibit p2 the true copy of the memorandum of appeal in a.s. no.100 of 201.of the additional district court-i, mavelikkara dated 1 6.2012. respondent(s)' exhibits: nil true copy p.s. to judge thomas p.joseph, j.==================================== o.p(c) nos.400 & 407 of 2013 ==================================== dated this the 30th day of january, 2013.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 OP(C).NO. 400 OF 201.(O) ------------------------------------- A.S.NO.100 OF 2012.FIRST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, MAVELIKKARA PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: ----------------------------------------- LEELA DEVI ANTHARJANAM AGED 6 YEARS W/O.VISHNU BHATTATHIRI,KIZHAKKE PULLAMVAZHY ILLOM HARIPPAD BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD NANTHANCODE P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,REP.BY SECRETARY 2 KRISHNAN NAMBOOTIRI KIZHAKKEPULLAMVAZHI ILLAM,HARIPPAD 3 NANGAYYA ANTHARJAMAN D/O.UMADEVI ANTHARJANAM,PAHZYADATH MADOM KURATTIKKADU MURI,MANNAR 4 UMADEVI ANTHARJANAM D/O.UMADEVI ANTHARJANAM,MUNDAKKAL MADATHIL CHERUKOLE MURI,CHERUKOLE VILLAGE,KOZHENCHERRY 5 SUBDRA ANTHARJANAM D/O.UMADEVI ANTHARJANAM,PARAZHIVETTATHUMANA VENGOOR P.O.,ANGAMALY 6 SREEKUMARI ANTHARJANAM D/O.UMADEVI ANTHARJANAM KIZHAKKEPULLAM VAZHI ILLOM PILAPPUZHA MURI,HARIPPAD VILLAGE. O.P(C) NO.400 OF 201.7. SUBRAHMANYAN NAMBPOOTHIRI @ THUPPAN NAMBOOTHIRI S/O.KRISHNAN NAMBOOTHIRI,KIZHAKKEPULLAMAVZHI ILLAM PILAPPUZHA MURI ,HARIPPAD VILLAGE 8 S.SREEKUMAR S/O.SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM,HOUSE NO 3.34.501(500A)AKSHARA,PDIVATTOM,EDAPPALLY P.O. ERNAKULAM.

9. S.HARIKUMAR S/O.SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM NEW NO 15(OLD NO 51/12)KAMARAJ AVENUE,2ND STREET ADIYAR,MADRAS-600020 10. S.CHANDRIKADEVI D/O.SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM,MADASSERI MANA KARUKANDAM POST,KOTHAMANGALAM,MOOVATTUPUZHA 11 S.SUKUMARAN BHATTATHIRI HOUSE NO 34,34/501(500A)AKSHARA,PDIVATTOM EDAPPALLY P.O.,ERNAKULAM R BY SRI.P.GOPAL THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-01-2013 ALONG WITH O.P(C) NO.407 OF 2013.THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P(C) NO.400 OF 201.APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 12 4.2012 IN O.S.NO.205 OF 200.OF THE SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA. EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL IN A.S. NO.100 OF 201.OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-I, MAVELIKKARA DATED 1 6.2012. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.

==================================== O.P(C) Nos.400 & 407 of 2013 ==================================== Dated this the 30th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT

These Original Petitions are filed by the 1st appellant in A.S. No.100 of 2012 and the appellant in A.S.No.79 of 2012 pending in the First Additional District Court, Mavelikkara. Prayer in these Original Petitions is for a direction to the learned Additional District Judge for speedy disposal of those appeals.

2. Learned counsel submits that the dispute involves framing of a Scheme and Thanthric right of Harippad Subramanya Swamy Temple. It is submitted that early disposal of the appeals is required.

3. Since the appeals are of the year 2012, I do not think it necessary to issue any direction for early disposal. However, this judgment will not stand in the way of petitioner impressing learned First Additional District Judge, Mavelikkara of the need to dispose of the appeals as early as possible. The Original Petitions are disposed of with the above observation. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial