A.Sureshkumar Vs. the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central)

A.Sureshkumar vs The Regional Labour Commissioner (Central)

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015324

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1015324
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh
Decided On: Jan 30, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Sureshkumar

Respondent

The Regional Labour Commissioner (Central)

Excerpt

.....the court on the same day delivered the following: kss wpc.no.30099/2012 j appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit-p1 - true copy of the relevant pages of permanent workers' register attested by the 2nd respondent. exhibit-p2 - true copy of the petition submitted by the petitioner for conciliation before the 1st respondent dated 5 12-2012. exhibit-p3 - true copy of the circular dated 11 12-2012 issued by the 2nd respondent. respondents' exhibits: n i l /true copy/ p.a.to judge kss v.chitambaresh, j --------------------------------------- w.p.(c).no.30099 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of january , 2013 order the only ground urged to the time of hearing is for earlier consideration of ext.p2 representation pending before the first respondent. the petitioner has invoke section 12 of the industrial dispute act for resolution of the dispute. the petitioner seeks convenient a conciliation conference to amicably settled the dispute. the petitioner contains that the dispute that otherwise a failure report may be forwarded to the government to enable an industrial dispute being adjudicated.2. i direct the first respondent to consider ext.p2 representation on merit after notice to respondents 2 and 3 and other interested persons the needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. v.chitambaresh judge as

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 30099 of 2012 (J) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- A.SURESHKUMAR, AGED 4 YEARS, S/O.RAMANKUTTY NAIR, GENERAL SECRETARY (BMS) ALAGAPPA TEXTILES, TRICHUR DISTRICT TEXTILE MAZDOOR SANGAM, (ALAGAPPA TEXTILE UNIT) REG.NO.256/79, P.O.ALAGAPPANAGAR,THRISSUR. BY ADVS.SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN SMT.MINI.V.A. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL), KENDRIYA SHARMSADAN,OLIMUGHAL,KAKKANAD, KOCHI ”

030.

2. ALAGAPPA TEXTILES (COCHIN) MILLS, ALAGAPPA NAGAR,TRICHUR ”

302. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.

3. MR.V.SASIDHARAN, (T NO.1937), ALAGAPPA TEXTILES (COCHIN) MILLS,ALAGAPPA NAGAR, TRICHUR ”

302. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA BY ADV.SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON R3 BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR R3 BY ADV. SRI.MANU GOVIND R3 BY ADV. SRI.JOPHY POTHEN KANDANKARY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.30099/2012 J APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT-P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF PERMANENT WORKERS' REGISTER ATTESTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 5 12-2012. EXHIBIT-P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 11 12-2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss V.CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.30099 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January , 2013 ORDER The only ground urged to the time of hearing is for earlier consideration of Ext.P2 representation pending before the first respondent. The petitioner has invoke Section 12 of the Industrial Dispute Act for resolution of the dispute. The petitioner seeks convenient a conciliation conference to amicably settled the dispute. The petitioner contains that the dispute that otherwise a failure report may be forwarded to the Government to enable an Industrial dispute being adjudicated.

2. I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation on merit after notice to respondents 2 and 3 and other interested persons the needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE AS

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties A.Sureshkumar vs The Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh