Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.A.ibrahim Vs. Mass Media Communication and Advertising

M.A.ibrahim vs Mass Media Communication and Advertising

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015315

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.A.ibrahim

Respondent

Mass Media Communication and Advertising

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the hon'ble mr. justice k.ramakrishnan wednesday, the 30th day of january 2013 10th magha 193 crl.mc.no. 2384 of 2008 ( ) --------------------------- against the order/judgment in cc.70/2007 of j.m.f.c.-i,kochi petitioner(s)/accused: -------------------------- m.a. ibrahim, s/o abdul khader, manappurath (pallithara) house near thayyzhuthu vazhi bus stop,vypin-muhambam road nayarambalam,ernakulam 68 509. by advs.sri.n.j.mathews sri.george varghese kizhakkambalam respondents/complainant(s): ------------------------------ 1. mass media communication & advertising pvt. ltd.,having its registered office at penta plaza,main road,north paravur represented by mr. k.a. hussainkutty 2 k.a. hussainkutty, aged about 5 years, s/o aboobacker haji,bank of india colony,asoka road kaloor kochi -17 3. state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala,ernakulam. r1 & 2 by adv. sri.george thomas (mevada) r3 by government pleader sri.liju stephen this criminal misc. case having been finally heard on 30-01- 2013, the court on the same day passed the following: k.ramakrishnan, j.---------------------------------------------------- criminal mc no.2384 of 2008 ---------------------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of january 2013 order the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial of the case has been completed and the prayer in this petition has become infructuous. in the light of the said submission, the petition is closed as infructuous. k.ramakrishnan, judge sta 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 2384 of 2008 ( ) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC.70/2007 of J.M.F.C.-I,KOCHI PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED: -------------------------- M.A. IBRAHIM, S/O ABDUL KHADER, MANAPPURATH (PALLITHARA) HOUSE NEAR THAYYZHUTHU VAZHI BUS STOP,VYPIN-MUHAMBAM ROAD NAYARAMBALAM,ERNAKULAM 68 509. BY ADVS.SRI.N.J.MATHEWS SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT(S): ------------------------------ 1. MASS MEDIA COMMUNICATION & ADVERTISING PVT. LTD.,HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PENTA PLAZA,MAIN ROAD,NORTH PARAVUR REPRESENTED BY MR. K.A. HUSSAINKUTTY 2 K.A. HUSSAINKUTTY, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, S/O ABOOBACKER HAJI,BANK OF INDIA COLONY,ASOKA ROAD KALOOR KOCHI -17 3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA) R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.LIJU STEPHEN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-01- 2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

---------------------------------------------------- Criminal MC No.2384 of 2008 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January 2013 Order The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial of the case has been completed and the prayer in this petition has become infructuous. In the light of the said submission, the petition is closed as infructuous. K.Ramakrishnan, Judge sta 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial