Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sudhani Vs. Salini M.P.

Sudhani vs Salini M.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015306

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sudhani

Respondent

Salini M.P.

Excerpt

.....at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice pius c.kuriakose & the hon'ble mr. justice p.d.rajan wednesday, the 30th day of january 2013 10th magha 193 mat.appeal.no. 771 of 2012 () ----------------------------------------- against the order dated 11 12-2012 in e.a.no.51/2012 in e.p.no.6/08 and op.1136/2006 of family court,ernakulam appellant(s)/petitioners/claimants: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. sudhani d/o.kochuvava, aged 2 years, kajiyath house,kammattipadam cochin-20.2. ammini w/o.kochuvava, do. do.3. rini w/o.prathapan, do. do.4. mini d/o.kochuvava, do. do.5. ginil s/o.kochuvava, do. do. by adv. sri.p.j.joseph panikkassery respondent(s): ---------------------------- 1. shalini m.p. moolakathara house,naduvathu nagar p.o., cherthala p.o.2. sunil kumar k.k. thundiparambil house,kumbalam p.o.,kochi.3. jeejan t., aged 3 years, s/o.thankachan,thundathil house,rail nagar vyttila p.o.,kochi-19. r1 by adv.sri.mohammed hashim(b/o) r2 by adv. sri.a.s.sasidharan r3 by advs. sri.jimmy george vattathara(b/o) & sri.t.s.jibu this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 30-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: mns pius c. kuriakose & p.d.rajan, jj.------------------------------ mat. appeal no.771 of 2012 ------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of january, 2013 judgment pius c. kuriakose, j.it is seen that while allowing i.a 17.of 2013 and granting time to the appellants till 28.01.2013 to comply with the conditions imposed by us for granting stay this court had made it clear that further extension of time will not be granted. on going through the proceeding sheet we find that this a case where maximum indulgence was shown by this court towards the respondent. we vacate the interim order already granted. we are not inclined to entertain this appeal filed by the appellants because notwithstanding several opportunities given, they have not chosen to comply with the conditions.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 Mat.Appeal.No. 771 of 2012 () ----------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 11 12-2012 IN E.A.NO.51/2012 IN E.P.NO.6/08 AND OP.1136/2006 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS/CLAIMANTS: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUDHANI D/O.KOCHUVAVA, AGED 2 YEARS, KAJIYATH HOUSE,KAMMATTIPADAM COCHIN-20.

2. AMMINI W/O.KOCHUVAVA, DO. DO.

3. RINI W/O.PRATHAPAN, DO. DO.

4. MINI D/O.KOCHUVAVA, DO. DO.

5. GINIL S/O.KOCHUVAVA, DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.JOSEPH PANIKKASSERY RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. SHALINI M.P. MOOLAKATHARA HOUSE,NADUVATHU NAGAR P.O., CHERTHALA P.O.

2. SUNIL KUMAR K.K. THUNDIPARAMBIL HOUSE,KUMBALAM P.O.,KOCHI.

3. JEEJAN T., AGED 3 YEARS, S/O.THANKACHAN,THUNDATHIL HOUSE,RAIL NAGAR VYTTILA P.O.,KOCHI-19. R1 BY ADV.SRI.MOHAMMED HASHIM(B/O) R2 BY ADV. SRI.A.S.SASIDHARAN R3 BY ADVS. SRI.JIMMY GEORGE VATTATHARA(B/O) & SRI.T.S.JIBU THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MNS PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & P.D.RAJAN, JJ.

------------------------------ Mat. Appeal No.771 of 2012 ------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

It is seen that while allowing I.A 17.of 2013 and granting time to the appellants till 28.01.2013 to comply with the conditions imposed by us for granting stay this Court had made it clear that further extension of time will not be granted. On going through the proceeding sheet we find that this a case where maximum indulgence was shown by this Court towards the respondent. We vacate the interim order already granted. We are not inclined to entertain this appeal filed by the appellants because notwithstanding several opportunities given, they have not chosen to comply with the conditions imposed. This appeal is therefore rejected. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE Judge P.D.RAJAN Judge mns

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial