Moidu Vs. Nafeesa

Moidu vs Nafeesa

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2013

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1015305

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1015305
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair
Decided On: Jan 30, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moidu

Respondent

Nafeesa

Excerpt

.....misc. case having come up for admission on 30-01-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: ns crl.mc.no. 673 of 2013 () appendix petitioner(s) annexures : annexure a1 : copy of the final report. annexure a2 : copy of the agreement. respondent(s) annexures : / true copy / ns p.a to judge t.r. ramachandran nair, j.--------------------------------------- crl. m.c. no.673 of 201.--------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of january, 2013. order the prayer in the crl.m.c is to quash the proceedings in c.c.no.53/2012 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court, kasaragod. annexure a1 is a copy of the final report.2. the petitioner and the 1st respondent are husband and wife. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the disputes between the parties have been settled out of court and the parties are not interested in continuing the case. they have executed an agreement as per annexure a2 stating that they are living together after the settlement of the disputes. learned counsel for the 1st respondent also submitted that no complaints are there for the 1st respondent wife and the parties are living together.3. in the agreement annexure a2, it is stated that the party nos.1 and 2 are living together along with their child happily in view of the settlement of their disputes and the 1st crl.m.c.no.673/2013 2 respondent has no objection in quashing the proceedings.4. in the light of the settlement between the parties, i am of the view that there will not be any useful purpose in proceeding with the criminal case. the crl.m.c is allowed and the proceedings in c.c.no.53/2012 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court, kasaragod will stand quashed. t.r. ramachandran nair judge smp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 673 of 2013 () ------------------------- C.C. NO.53/2012 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,KASARAGOD ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:- --------------------------------------- MOIDU, AGED 4 YEARS, S/O.ALIKUNHI,RESIDING AT THALAKALA VILLAGE, MANJESHWAR POST,THALAKALA,KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON COMPLAINANT(S)/RESPONDENTS/STATE:-: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. NAFEESA,, AGED 2 YEARS, D/O.ABDULLA,R/AT GOLIYADKA,NEERCHAL VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK,KASARAGOD DISTRICT.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.SIJU MATHEW BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ADV. SRI. T.R. RAMA PRASAD UNNI THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: NS Crl.MC.No. 673 of 2013 () APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES : ANNEXURE A1 : COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT. ANNEXURE A2 : COPY OF THE AGREEMENT. RESPONDENT(S) ANNEXURES : / TRUE COPY / NS P.A TO JUDGE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl. M.C. No.673 OF 201.--------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January, 2013. ORDER

The prayer in the Crl.M.C is to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.53/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kasaragod. Annexure A1 is a copy of the Final Report.

2. The petitioner and the 1st respondent are husband and wife. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the disputes between the parties have been settled out of court and the parties are not interested in continuing the case. They have executed an agreement as per Annexure A2 stating that they are living together after the settlement of the disputes. Learned counsel for the 1st respondent also submitted that no complaints are there for the 1st respondent wife and the parties are living together.

3. In the agreement Annexure A2, it is stated that the party Nos.1 and 2 are living together along with their child happily in view of the settlement of their disputes and the 1st Crl.M.C.No.673/2013 2 respondent has no objection in quashing the proceedings.

4. In the light of the settlement between the parties, I am of the view that there will not be any useful purpose in proceeding with the criminal case. The Crl.M.C is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.53/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kasaragod will stand quashed. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Moidu vs Nafeesa Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair