Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Schipani Vs. United States

Schipani vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101504

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 372
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Schipani

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

schipani v. united states - 385 u.s. 372 (1966) u.s. supreme court schipani v. united states, 385 u.s. 372 (1966) 385 u.s. 372 schipani v. united states. on petition for rehearing. no. 504. certiorari denied, november 7, 1966. petition for rehearing granted, december 12, 1966. certiorari granted; 362 f.2d 825 , vacated and remanded. jacob p. lefkowitz for petitioner. solicitor general marshall for the united states. per curiam. upon the suggestion of the solicitor general and upon an independent examination of the case, the petition for a rehearing is granted, the order of this court denying certiorari is vacated, certiorari is granted, the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the eastern district of new york for a new trial should the government seek to prosecute petitioner anew. page 385 u.s. 372, 373

Full Judgment

SCHIPANI v. UNITED STATES - 385 U.S. 372 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court SCHIPANI v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 372 (1966) 385 U.S. 372

SCHIPANI v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
No. 504. Certiorari denied, November 7, 1966. Petition for rehearing granted, December 12, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 362 F.2d 825 , vacated and remanded.

Jacob P. Lefkowitz for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an independent examination of the case, the petition for a rehearing is granted, the order of this Court denying certiorari is vacated, certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for a new trial should the Government seek to prosecute petitioner anew.

Page 385 U.S. 372, 373



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial