Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nisha Vs. the State of Kerala

Nisha vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1014479

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nisha

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....2013 11th magha 193 crl.mc.no. 706 of 2013 ---------------------------------- against the order/judgment in cc.109/2012 of judicial first class magistrate, vaikom crime no. 175/2011 of thalayolaparambu police station , kottayam 1 tt petitioner/defacto complainant and accused : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. nisha, aged 3 years, w/o. rajeev r.pillai, residing at kochupurackal house, maravanthuruthu p.o.,vaikom,kottayam.2. rajeev r.pillai s/o. ramachandran pillai,lakshmi kripa,varanadu p.o. cherthala.3. ramachandran pillai lakshmi kripa,varanadu p.o.,cherthala.4. vijayamma w/o. ramachandran pillai,lakshmi kripa,varanadu p.o. cherthala. by adv. sri.r.rajasekharan pillai complainant(s): ------------------------------ the state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor high court of kerala,ernakulam-682031. by smt.v.h.jasmine, public prosecutor this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 31-01-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: as crl.mc.no. 706 of 2013 appendix petitioner(s) exhibits: annexure 1 : copy of fir in crime no.175/2011 of thalayolaparambu police station charged in the judicial first class magistrate court, vaikom. annexure 2 : copy of the order dtd.3.7.2012 in tp no.474/2011 of the hon'ble apex court. annexure 3 : copy of the notice dtd.21.8.2012 of the family court, ettumanoor. annexure 4 : copy of the report dtd.15.12.2012 submitted by the counsellor before the family court, ettumanoor. respondents' exhibits: nil /true copy/ p.a.to judge as t.r.ramachandran nair, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl. m.c.no. 706 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 31st day of january, 2013 order the defacto complainant as well as her husband along with his relatives are the petitioners herein. the second petitioner is the husband of the first petitioner and petitioners 3 and 4 are the parents of the second.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH MAGHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 706 of 2013 ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC.109/2012 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, VAIKOM CRIME NO. 175/2011 OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION , KOTTAYAM 1 TT PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND ACCUSED : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NISHA, AGED 3 YEARS, W/O. RAJEEV R.PILLAI, RESIDING AT KOCHUPURACKAL HOUSE, MARAVANTHURUTHU P.O.,VAIKOM,KOTTAYAM.

2. RAJEEV R.PILLAI S/O. RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI,LAKSHMI KRIPA,VARANADU P.O. CHERTHALA.

3. RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI LAKSHMI KRIPA,VARANADU P.O.,CHERTHALA.

4. VIJAYAMMA W/O. RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI,LAKSHMI KRIPA,VARANADU P.O. CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI COMPLAINANT(S): ------------------------------ THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031. BY SMT.V.H.JASMINE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: AS Crl.MC.No. 706 of 2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE 1 : COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.175/2011 OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION CHARGED IN THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, VAIKOM. ANNEXURE 2 : COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.3.7.2012 IN TP NO.474/2011 OF THE HON'BLE APEX COURT. ANNEXURE 3 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.21.8.2012 OF THE FAMILY COURT, ETTUMANOOR. ANNEXURE 4 : COPY OF THE REPORT DTD.15.12.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSELLOR BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ETTUMANOOR. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE AS T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl. M.C.No. 706 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF JANUARY, 2013 ORDER

The defacto complainant as well as her husband along with his relatives are the petitioners herein. The second petitioner is the husband of the first petitioner and petitioners 3 and 4 are the parents of the second petitioners. Petitioners 2, 3 and 4 have been arrayed as accused in Crime No.175/2011 of Thalayolaparambu Police Station. The offences alleged are under Sections 498A and 406 read with Section 34 IPC. It is now pending as C.C. No.109/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vaikom.

2. It is submitted that all the disputes have been settled and the parties are living together. They have got one child in the wedlock. In fact, the parties have entered into a settlement in the light of the observations made by the Apex Court in Annexure 2 order. Therein, the transfer of F.C.O.P.No.92/2011 pending before the Family Court, Salem was ordered to the Family Court, Kottayam. The Apex Court directed the transferee court to take all endeavour either for amicable settlement or for early decision in the main matter without unnecessary adjournment. It Crl.M.C.No.706/2013 -2- is stated that thereafter the disputes have been settled between the parties amicably.

3. In the light of the above settlement, there will not be any useful purpose in proceeding with the criminal case, especially in the light of the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Ramesh Chandra Sankla v. Vikram Cements {(2008) XIV SCC 580}. For all these reasons, the Crl.M.C. is allowed. The proceedings in C.C. No.109/2012 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vaikom will stand quashed as against the petitioners 2 to 4. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) kav/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial