Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sandhya Vs. Shaji

Sandhya vs Shaji

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1014463

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sandhya

Respondent

Shaji

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice pius c.kuriakose & the hon'ble mr. justice babu mathew p.joseph thursday, the 31st day of january 2013 11th magha 193 mat.appeal.no. 374 of 2011 ( ) ------------------------------ op.1281/2007 of family court, nedumangad. ................. appellant/respondent: -------------------------------------- sandhya, w/o.shaji, aged 2 years, residing at sandhya bhavan, chempakassery, adayamon p.o., thiruvananthapuram district-695 614. by smt.sumathy dandapani, senior advocate. adv. sri.millu dandapani. respondent/petitioner: ------------------------------------------- shaji, s/o.karthikeyan, aged 4 years, residing at gandhi sadanam, karette, pulimath p.o., chirayinkeezhu taluk, thiruvananthapuram -695 612. by advs. sri.m.dinesh, sri.r.gopan, sri.shajin s.hameed. this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 31-01-2013, along with mat appeal no.587 of 201.and mat appeal no.603 of 201.the court on the same day delivered the following: rs. mat.appeal.no. 374 of 2011 appendix petitioner's annexures:- annexure a copy of the report issued by the child development centre, dated 20 01/2011. respondent's annexures:- nil. //true copy// p.a. to judge rs. pius c. kuriakose & babu mathew p. joseph, jj.==================== mat. appeal nos. 374 of 2011, 603 of 2011 & 587 of 2011 ==================== dated this the 31st day of january, 2013 judgment a joint compromise petition has been filed by the parties. we went through the compromise petition. we do not find anything illegal about the terms of the compromise. we allow the compromise petition and record the contents of the compromise which will form part of this judgment. the appeal is disposed in view of the compromise. sd/- pius c. kuriakose judge sd/- babu mathew p. joseph judge kvr/ /true copy/ p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH MAGHA 193 Mat.Appeal.No. 374 of 2011 ( ) ------------------------------ OP.1281/2007 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD. ................. APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- SANDHYA, W/O.SHAJI, AGED 2 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANDHYA BHAVAN, CHEMPAKASSERY, ADAYAMON P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 614. BY SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI, SENIOR ADVOCATE. ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------- SHAJI, S/O.KARTHIKEYAN, AGED 4 YEARS, RESIDING AT GANDHI SADANAM, KARETTE, PULIMATH P.O., CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 612. BY ADVS. SRI.M.DINESH, SRI.R.GOPAN, SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-01-2013, ALONG WITH MAT APPEAL NO.587 OF 201.AND MAT APPEAL NO.603 OF 201.THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. Mat.Appeal.No. 374 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A COPY OF THE REPORT ISSUED BY THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE, DATED 20 01/2011. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JJ.

==================== Mat. Appeal Nos. 374 of 2011, 603 of 2011 & 587 of 2011 ==================== Dated this the 31st day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT A joint compromise petition has been filed by the parties. We went through the compromise petition. We do not find anything illegal about the terms of the compromise. We allow the compromise petition and record the contents of the compromise which will form part of this judgment. The appeal is disposed in view of the compromise. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE Sd/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH JUDGE kvr/ /True copy/ P.A. to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial