Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.H.Rasheed Vs. State of Kerala

K.H.Rasheed vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1014459

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.H.Rasheed

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice t.r.ramachandran nair thursday, the 31st day of january 2013 11th magha 193 op(crl.).no. 4026 of 2012 (q) ---------------------------------------- against the order/judgment in cc.329/2001 of judicial first class magistrate-i,kozhikode petitioner: ------------------- k.h.rasheed, s/o.hameed,karoli veedu,h no iv/350, seeemoolanagaram,kalady. by adv. sri.devaprasanth.p.j.respondent(s): ---------------------------- state of kerala, represented by si of town police station, kozhikode represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala-682 031. by smt.v.h.jasmine, government pleader this op (criminal) having been finally heard on 31-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: as op(crl.).no. 4026 of 2012 (q) appendix petitioner(s) exhibits: exhibit p1: certified copy of the judgment in cc no 329/2001 dated 22 11.2007 passed by jfcm-i, kozhikode. respondents' exhibits: nil /true copy/ p.a.to judge as t.r.ramachandran nair, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o.p.(crl) no. 4026 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 31st day of january, 2013 judgment the prayer is to quash the prosecution and the proceedings in c.c. no.531/2007 pending on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court -i, kozhikode. it is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the the petitioner was the fifth accused in the said case and the case was split up and all the other accused have been acquitted as evident from ext.p1 judgment. it is seen that the case is now pending as l.p.no.11/2012.2. my attention was invited to paragraphs 7 and 8 of the judgment, ext.p1. it appears that the court was of the view that the evidence adduced by the prosecution that film was exhibited without certificate issued by the central board of film certification, already stands disproved. it is submitted that the petitioner was only an employee.3. it.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH MAGHA 193 OP(Crl.).No. 4026 of 2012 (Q) ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC.329/2001 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I,KOZHIKODE PETITIONER: ------------------- K.H.RASHEED, S/O.HAMEED,KAROLI VEEDU,H NO IV/350, SEEEMOOLANAGARAM,KALADY. BY ADV. SRI.DEVAPRASANTH.P.J.

RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SI OF TOWN POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA-682 031. BY SMT.V.H.JASMINE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AS OP(Crl.).No. 4026 of 2012 (Q) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CC NO 329/2001 DATED 22 11.2007 PASSED BY JFCM-I, KOZHIKODE. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE AS T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.(Crl) No. 4026 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF JANUARY, 2013 JUDGMENT The prayer is to quash the prosecution and the proceedings in C.C. No.531/2007 pending on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court -I, Kozhikode. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the the petitioner was the fifth accused in the said case and the case was split up and all the other accused have been acquitted as evident from Ext.P1 judgment. It is seen that the case is now pending as L.P.No.11/2012.

2. My attention was invited to paragraphs 7 and 8 of the judgment, Ext.P1. It appears that the court was of the view that the evidence adduced by the prosecution that film was exhibited without certificate issued by the Central Board of Film Certification, already stands disproved. It is submitted that the petitioner was only an employee.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner could not appear before the court, as summons was not received and thereafter he was out of State also.

4. The petitioner will surrender before the court within a period of two weeks from today and if he files an application for bail, the same will O.P.(Crl.).No.4026/2012 -2- be considered preferably on the same date of surrender. The court will be free to fix appropriate conditions for the grant of bail. The Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) kav/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial