Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

State of Kerala Vs. K.Bhaskaran

State of Kerala vs K.Bhaskaran

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1014417

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Kerala

Respondent

K.Bhaskaran

Excerpt

.....in w.p.(c) no.6983/2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 31st day of january, 2013 order this is a review petition seeking to review the interim order dated 10.8.2012 passed by this court.2. heard both sides. learned government pleader submitted that the grounds of the review petition will show that certain enquiries are going on at the hands of the chief technical examiner in respect of the work in question done by the petitioner. it is stated that without getting the report, the petitioners are not in a position to comply with the interim order passed by this court.3. learned counsel for the writ petitioner points out that by relying upon para 14 of the counter affidavit alone, this court passed the interim order. in the interim order this court has stated the following: "in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the second respondent, in paragraphs 11 and 14 the objection is with regard to the payment of alleged damages (which is not admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner), to the tune of rs.13,03,207/- plus the risk and cost calculated as per the agreement conditions.)" therefore, there is no apparent error in the interim order. learned r.p.44/2013 -2- government pleader takes the stand that there are certain other aspects which should have been pointed out before this court. the review sought is devoid of any merit. the review petition is thus dismissed. no costs. (t.r.ramachandran nair, judge) kav/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH MAGHA 193 RP.No. 44 of 2013 (W) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).6983/2012 DATED 10 08-2012. .............. REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND ADMINISTRATION, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, KOTTAYAM-686 002. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T. RAMAPRASAD UNNI. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN WPC: ----------------------------------------------------- K. BHASKARAN, SNEHALAYAM, PUTHIYAVILA P.O., VELANHIRA, KAYAMKULAM-690 531. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ANISON. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No. 44/2013 in W.P.(C) No.6983/2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF JANUARY, 2013 ORDER

This is a review petition seeking to review the interim order dated 10.8.2012 passed by this Court.

2. Heard both sides. Learned Government Pleader submitted that the grounds of the review petition will show that certain enquiries are going on at the hands of the Chief Technical Examiner in respect of the work in question done by the petitioner. It is stated that without getting the report, the petitioners are not in a position to comply with the interim order passed by this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner points out that by relying upon para 14 of the counter affidavit alone, this Court passed the interim order. In the interim order this Court has stated the following: "In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the second respondent, in paragraphs 11 and 14 the objection is with regard to the payment of alleged damages (which is not admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner), to the tune of Rs.13,03,207/- plus the risk and cost calculated as per the agreement conditions.)" Therefore, there is no apparent error in the interim order. Learned R.P.44/2013 -2- Government Pleader takes the stand that there are certain other aspects which should have been pointed out before this Court. The review sought is devoid of any merit. The review petition is thus dismissed. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) kav/

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties State of Kerala vs K.Bhaskaran Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales