Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohanan Vs. State of Kerala

Mohanan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1014391

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohanan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....by the s.i of police, aluva police station (crime no.3048/12) represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala,ernakulam. by public prosecutor smt. laliza t.y. this bail application having come up for admission on 31-01-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: kss p.bhavadasan, j ----------------------------------------- b.a no.359 of 2013 --------------------------------------------------- dated this the 31st day of january, 2013 order the petitioners had moved this court earlier by way of b.a no.9239/2012 for the very same relief. this court after perusing the records found that it is inappropriate to grant relief to the petitioners and dismissed the petition. the learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the matter has been settled and disputes have been reconciled. there is no materials to show the above fact. apart from that as no change of circumstances is pointed out, the petition is dismissed. however, if so advised, the petitioners may surrender before the investigating officer on or before 11.2.2013 who after interrogation, shall produce them before the jfcm court concerned. if the petitioners move applications for regular bail before the said court, the learned magistrate shall consider and pass orders thereon in accordance with law, if possible, on the same day itself. p.bhavadasan judge ab

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH MAGHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 359 of 2013 () ----------------------------- CRIME NO. 3048/2012 OF ALUVA POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM ............ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 8.------------------------------------------------------- 1. MOHANAN, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAN BAVA,THUNDIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUTHIRAKKADU COLONY,KEEZHUMADU.

2. PRIYAN,AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.MOHANAN,THUNDIPARAMBIL HOUSE,MUTHIRAKKADU COLONY, KEEZHUMADU.

3. PREMJI,AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.MOHANAN,THUNDIPARAMBIL HOUSE,MUTHIRAKKADU COLONY, KEEZHUMADU.

4. SYAM,AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.SOJAN,MARIYIL HOUSE,KOOTHATTUKULAM.

5. SABIN, AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY,PALANCHERY HOUSE,KUNJATTU KARA.

6. NIMESH,AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY,MAITHANIMUGAL,EDATHALA.

7. PUSHPAN,AGED 4 YEARS, S/O.CHATHAN,MANJALY THETTAYIL HOUSE,CHENGAMANADU.

8. SANEESH,AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.SAJI,KOTTINADU HOUSE,PUKALKATTUPADY. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): -------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE S.I OF POLICE, ALUVA POLICE STATION (CRIME NO.3048/12) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA T.Y. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.BHAVADASAN, J ----------------------------------------- B.A No.359 of 2013 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of January, 2013 ORDER

The petitioners had moved this Court earlier by way of B.A No.9239/2012 for the very same relief. This Court after perusing the records found that it is inappropriate to grant relief to the petitioners and dismissed the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the matter has been settled and disputes have been reconciled. There is no materials to show the above fact. Apart from that as no change of circumstances is pointed out, the petition is dismissed. However, if so advised, the petitioners may surrender before the Investigating Officer on or before 11.2.2013 who after interrogation, shall produce them before the JFCM Court concerned. If the petitioners move applications for regular bail before the said court, the learned Magistrate shall consider and pass orders thereon in accordance with law, if possible, on the same day itself. P.BHAVADASAN Judge ab

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial