Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Texas Vs. United States

Texas vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-02-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101394

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
384 U.S. 155
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Texas

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

texas v. united states - 384 u.s. 155 (1966) u.s. supreme court texas v. united states, 384 u.s. 155 (1966) 384 u.s. 155 texas v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of texas. no. 1218. decided may 2, 1966. 252 f. supp. 234, affirmed. waggoner carr, attorney general of texas, hawthorne phillips, first assistant attorney general, and mary k. wall, assistant attorney general, for appellant. solicitor general marshall for the united states. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. harper v. virginia state board of elections, 383 u.s. 663 . mr. justice black dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in harper v. virginia state board of elections, supra. mr. justice harlan, joined by mr. justice stewart, dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in harper v. virginia state board of elections, supra. page 384 u.s. 155, 156

Full Judgment

TEXAS v. UNITED STATES - 384 U.S. 155 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court TEXAS v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 155 (1966) 384 U.S. 155

TEXAS v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 1218.
Decided May 2, 1966.

252 F. Supp. 234, affirmed.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, joined by MR. JUSTICE STEWART, dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

Page 384 U.S. 155, 156



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial