Narayani Vs. the District Collector, Ottappalam

Narayani vs The District Collector, Ottappalam

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 04, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1013621
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon
Decided On: Feb 04, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narayani

Respondent

The District Collector, Ottappalam

Excerpt

.....by the village officer, kizhakkenchery dated 11 10/2010 ext.p2:- true copy of the application dated 10 1/2013 submitted by the petitioner before the ist respondent. respondents' exhibits : nil. /true copy/ p.a.to judge rvs. p.r. ramachandra menon, j.--------------------------------------- w.p.(c). no. 2494 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 4th day of february, 2013 judgment the grievance of the petitioner is that, the application sought to be preferred by the petitioner for issuance of noc as provided under rule 5(7) of the kerala minor mineral concession (amendment) rules 2012, is not being received by the 1st respondent which hence is sought to be intercepted in this writ petition.2. heard the learned government pleader as well.3. considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this court finds that the 1st respondent, who is the concerned authority under the relevant provisions of law to deal with the matter and to issue noc, so as to enable the petitioner to have the requisite permit/licece issued by the concerned geologist, the petitioner is permitted to file a proper application before the 1st respondent within 'two weeks' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, upon which the same shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law, after w.p.c. no. 2494 of 2013 -2- hearing at the earliest, at any rate, within 'one month' thereafter. the petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for further steps. writ petition is disposed of. p.r. ramachandra menon, judge. kp/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 15TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 2494 of 2013 (J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------- NARAYANI, AGED 5 YEARS, W/O.CHANDRAN, KUNNANKATTIL , MOOLANKODE P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY AMSOM, ALATHOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ.

RESPONDENTS : ----------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD DIST., PIN-67”

2. THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, PALAKKAD DIST., PIN-679 101. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rvs. WP(C).No. 2494 of 2013 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIOENR ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KIZHAKKENCHERY DATED 11 10/2010 EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 10 1/2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL. /True Copy/ P.A.TO JUDGE rvs. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 2494 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2013 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that, the application sought to be preferred by the petitioner for issuance of NOC as provided under Rule 5(7) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules 2012, is not being received by the 1st respondent which hence is sought to be intercepted in this writ petition.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court finds that the 1st respondent, who is the concerned authority under the relevant provisions of law to deal with the matter and to issue NOC, so as to enable the petitioner to have the requisite permit/licece issued by the concerned Geologist, the petitioner is permitted to file a proper application before the 1st respondent within 'two weeks' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, upon which the same shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law, after W.P.C. No. 2494 of 2013 -2- hearing at the earliest, at any rate, within 'one month' thereafter. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for further steps. Writ petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. Kp/-

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Narayani vs The District Collector, Ottappalam Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon