Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

T.N.Raju Vs. Manager

T.N.Raju vs Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 04, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013599

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.N.Raju

Respondent

Manager

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice antony dominic monday, the 4th day of february 2013 15th magha 193 wp(c).no. 3149 of 2013 (p) -------------------------------------- petitioner: ------------------- raju t.n, thonnan kaiparambil house,arattupuzha, mukundapuram taluk,thrissur. by adv. sri.k.a.sreejith. respondents: ----------------------- 1. manager, k.s.f.e,thrissur main branch, thrissur-1.2. deputy tahsildar, revenue recovery, k.s.f.e,thrissur-20. by sri.johnson t.john, s.c, sri.lal george, s.c. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 04-02-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: prv. w.p.(c). no.3149/2013-p: appendix petitioner's exhibit: ext.p.1: copy of the demand notice under section 7 of revenue recovery act. respondents' exhibits: nil. //true copy// p.a. to judge prv. antony dominic, j ........................................ w.p.(c).3149/2013 .............................................. dated this the 4th day of february, 2013 judgment heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank.2. petitioner is a defaulter to the respondents. as a result, revenue recovery proceedings are initiated against him by ext.p1. it is there upon that this writ petition is filed and the prayer made is only for an instalment facility. since the petitioner is neither disputing the liability nor the quantum, i dispose of this writ petition allowing the petitioner to pay the amounts due to the respondents in ten equal monthly instalments. first instalment shall be paid on or before 25.2.2013 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before 25th of every succeeding month. subject to payment as above, recovery proceedings initiated will stand stayed and in case of default, respondents will be free to continue the recovery action already initiated. sd/- antony dominic, judge mrcs /true copy/ pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 15TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 3149 of 2013 (P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- RAJU T.N, THONNAN KAIPARAMBIL HOUSE,ARATTUPUZHA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SREEJITH. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. MANAGER, K.S.F.E,THRISSUR MAIN BRANCH, THRISSUR-1.

2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, K.S.F.E,THRISSUR-20. BY SRI.JOHNSON T.JOHN, S.C, SRI.LAL GEORGE, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Prv. W.P.(C). NO.3149/2013-P: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 7 OF REVENUE RECOVERY ACT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ........................................ W.P.(C).3149/2013 .............................................. Dated this the 4th day of February, 2013 JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank.

2. Petitioner is a defaulter to the respondents. As a result, revenue recovery proceedings are initiated against him by Ext.P1. It is there upon that this writ petition is filed and the prayer made is only for an instalment facility. Since the petitioner is neither disputing the liability nor the quantum, I dispose of this writ petition allowing the petitioner to pay the amounts due to the respondents in ten equal monthly instalments. First instalment shall be paid on or before 25.2.2013 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before 25th of every succeeding month. Subject to payment as above, recovery proceedings initiated will stand stayed and in case of default, respondents will be free to continue the recovery action already initiated. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mrcs /true copy/ PA To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial