Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Narayanankutty Vs. K.J.George

Narayanankutty vs K.J.George

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 04, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013592

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narayanankutty

Respondent

K.J.George

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice k.harilal monday, the 4th day of february 2013 15th magha 193 crl.rev.pet.no. 1531 of 2002 ( ) -------------------------------- cra.279/2000 of sessions court,kottayam. cc.325/1997 of judicial first class magistrate court-ii, kanjirappally. ............... petitioner-appellant-accused: ----------------------------------------------------- narayanankutty, united india insurance company limited, muvattupuzha p.o., ernakulam district. by advs. sri.mathew john, sri.baby thomas. respondents-respondents-complainants: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. k.j.george, kulackalil house, karikkattoor p.o., manimala.2. state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. r2 by public prosecutor mr.liju v.stephen. this criminal revision petition having been finally heard on 04-02-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: rs. k.harilal, j.--------------------------------------- crl.r.p.no.1531 of 200.--------------------------------------- dated this the 4th day of february, 2013. order the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that this revision petition is not pressed. hence, the revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- k.harilal, judge sd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 15TH MAGHA 193 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1531 of 2002 ( ) -------------------------------- CRA.279/2000 OF SESSIONS COURT,KOTTAYAM. CC.325/1997 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, KANJIRAPPALLY. ............... PETITIONER-APPELLANT-ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------------------- NARAYANANKUTTY, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, MUVATTUPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.MATHEW JOHN, SRI.BABY THOMAS. RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS-COMPLAINANTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.J.

GEORGE, KULACKALIL HOUSE, KARIKKATTOOR P.O., MANIMALA.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.LIJU V.STEPHEN. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. K.HARILAL, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.1531 OF 200.--------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2013. ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that this revision petition is not pressed. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- K.HARILAL, JUDGE sd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial