Manoj V.John Vs. Chairman

Manoj V.John vs Chairman

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 04, 2013

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013573

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1013573
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon
Decided On: Feb 04, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj V.John

Respondent

Chairman

Excerpt

.....exhibits: nil //true copy// p.s. to judge sk/- p.r. ramachandra menon, j.--------------------------------------- w.p.(c). no. 892 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 4th day of february, 2013 judgment the petitioner is stated as having some grievance with regard to the course, procedure and attitude of the respondents particularly on the part of some employees in connection with the 'chitty transactions' as stated in the writ petition. met with the situation, the petitioner has already approached the respondents by filing exts. p1 and p2 representations which according to the petitioner are still kept in the cold storage; thus compelling the petitioner to approach this court for immediate interference.2. the learned standing counsel for the respondents submits that, no documents have been submitted by the petitioner along with exts.p1 and p2. however, immediate action has been taken and that the matter is being processed; simultaneously adding that the matter will be enquired into and the outcome will be communicated to the petitioner. it is open for the petitioner to produce documents if any, in support of the case projected in exts.p1 and p2, which shall be done forthwith, w.p.c. no. 892 of 2013 -2- at any rate, within two weeks, along with a copy of this judgment. in view of the submission made by the learned standing counsel for the respondents, no further orders are called for. the matter shall be heard and finalized by the respondents in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. p.r. ramachandra menon, judge. kp/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 15TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 892 of 2013 (J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- MANOJ V.JOHN S/O.JOHN, VALIYATHARAYIL VEEDU, KANJIRAMATTOM AMBALLOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.RAJEEV (ALUVA) SRI.N.S.AJAY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHAIRMAN KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES (NON-BANKING COMPANY OWNED BY GOVERNMENT OF KERALA) BHADRATHA MUSEUM ROAD, PB NO.510-THRISSUR ”

020.

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD (NON-BANKING COMPANY OWNED BY GOVERNMENT OF KERALA) BHADRATHA MUSEUM ROAD, PB NO.510-THRISSUR ”

020. BY SRI.JOHNSON T.JOHN, SC, KSFE LTD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 892 of 2013 (J) :: :: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE RESPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 22 11/2012. EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE RESPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 4 1/2013. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //true copy// P.S. To Judge sk/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 892 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner is stated as having some grievance with regard to the course, procedure and attitude of the respondents particularly on the part of some employees in connection with the 'chitty transactions' as stated in the writ petition. Met with the situation, the petitioner has already approached the respondents by filing Exts. P1 and P2 representations which according to the petitioner are still kept in the cold storage; thus compelling the petitioner to approach this Court for immediate interference.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that, no documents have been submitted by the petitioner along with Exts.P1 and P2. However, immediate action has been taken and that the matter is being processed; simultaneously adding that the matter will be enquired into and the outcome will be communicated to the petitioner. It is open for the petitioner to produce documents if any, in support of the case projected in Exts.P1 and P2, which shall be done forthwith, W.P.C. No. 892 of 2013 -2- at any rate, within two weeks, along with a copy of this judgment. In view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, no further orders are called for. The matter shall be heard and finalized by the respondents in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. Kp/-

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Manoj V.John vs Chairman Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon