Bhuvanachandran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Bhuvanachandran vs State of Kerala and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 04, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1013510
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan
Decided On: Feb 04, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhuvanachandran

Respondent

State of Kerala and Another

Excerpt

.....pazhaneerkonam muri,noornadu village, from malayilkunnathu veedu,neduvaramcode p.o., thuruthummel muri,cheriyanadu village. by public prosecutor adv. smt. rema r. this criminal misc. case having been finally heard on 04-02-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: ns crl.mc.no. 241 of 2010 ( ) appendix petitioner(s) annexures : annexure 1 : certified copy fir in crime 28 of 200.of mannar police station. annexure 2 : copy of the reports dated 26 11.2006 submitted by the investigating agency. annexure 3 : affidavit sworn by the 2nd respondent. respondent(s) annexures : nil / true copy/ ns p.a. to judge p. bhavadasan, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl.m.c. no. 241 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 4th day of february, 2013. order as early as on 29.1.2010, this court had passed an order directing the learned public prosecutor to ascertain whether the petitioner has married the second respondent as alleged. on 26.3.2010 the learned public prosecutor represented that the information received by the investigating officer and the public prosecutor was that there has been no such marriage. this court therefore directed the petitioner to produce the document to prove the marriage. there were two subsequent postings and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. today also there is no representation. therefore, this application is dismissed. p. bhavadasan, judge sb.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 15TH MAGHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 241 of 2010 ( ) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------- BHUVANACHANDRAN, AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.RAJAPPAN,MELETHU VEEDU,PAZHANEERKONAM MURI, NOORANADU VILLAGE,FROM MALAYILKUNNATHU VEEDU, NEDUVARAMCODE P.O.,THURUTHUMMEL MURI, CHERIYANADU VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.ANIL (K/1480/98) RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT(S)/STATE : -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGHCOURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, (CRIME NO.283 OF 200.OF THE MANNAR POLICE STATION) 2. SURYA, AGED 2 YEARS, W/O.BHUVANACHANDRAN,MELETHU VEEDU, PAZHANEERKONAM MURI,NOORNADU VILLAGE, FROM MALAYILKUNNATHU VEEDU,NEDUVARAMCODE P.O., THURUTHUMMEL MURI,CHERIYANADU VILLAGE. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ADV. SMT. REMA R. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: NS Crl.MC.No. 241 of 2010 ( ) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES : ANNEXURE 1 : CERTIFIED COPY FIR IN CRIME 28 OF 200.OF MANNAR POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE 2 : COPY OF THE REPORTS DATED 26 11.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE INVESTIGATING AGENCY. ANNEXURE 3 : AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S) ANNEXURES : NIL / TRUE COPY/ NS P.A. TO JUDGE P. BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 241 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of February, 2013. ORDER As early as on 29.1.2010, this court had passed an order directing the learned Public Prosecutor to ascertain whether the petitioner has married the second respondent as alleged. On 26.3.2010 the learned Public Prosecutor represented that the information received by the Investigating Officer and the Public Prosecutor was that there has been no such marriage. This court therefore directed the petitioner to produce the document to prove the marriage. There were two subsequent postings and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also there is no representation. Therefore, this application is dismissed. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Bhuvanachandran vs State of Kerala and Another Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan