Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Alavi Vs. the District Collector

Alavi vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 29, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013452

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Alavi

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....this court with the following prayers : i. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and pass orders on exts. p1 to p3 representations submitted b the petitioners, forthwith, without an further delay. ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the first respondent to initiate action against the 4th respondent under section 13 of the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland act, 2008 iii. grant such other reliefs as this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.2. when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance as projected in this writ petition has also been highlighted by way of exts. p1 to p3 before the first respondent. it is also stated that the petitioners will be satisfied, if a direction is w.p.(c) no. 2622 of 2013 :2. : given to the first respondent to have said representations considered and finalized within a reasonable time.3. heard the learned government pleader as well.4. considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case for the time being. the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on exts. p1 to p3 in accordance with law; after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, the 4th respondent and also to other affected parties, if any; at the earliest, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. the petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for further steps. sd/- p. r. ramachandra menon, (judge) kmd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 9TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 2622 of 2013 (C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. ALAVI, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.ABDURAHIMAN,KAITHARA HOUSE, POOKOTTUMPADAM,PAYAMPADAM,NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. V.MUHAMMED, S/O.KUNHAYAMMU, VENGASSERY HOUSE, POOKKOTTUMPADAM,PAYAMPADAM, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. SABITH E.K., S/O.NAJEEB, EDAKKANDAN HOUSE, POOKKOTTUMPADAM,PAYAMPADAM,NILAMBUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

4. SURESH BABU, S/O.RAMAN, KIDANGAZHATH HOUSE, POOKKOTTUMPADAM,PAYAMPADAM,NILAMBUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR SMT.SMITHA BABU RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM,PIN ”

505.

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN ”

322.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AMARAMBALAM VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN ”

332.

4. ABDUPPA, KUZHIYAMPALLY HOUSE, POOKOTTUMPADAM PAYAMPADAM, NILAMBUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN ”

332. R1 - R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI GEORGE MECHERIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 2622 of 2013 (C) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 5 12.2012 EXT.P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 5 12.2012 EXT.P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 5 12.2012 EXT.P-4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 5 12.2012 ISSUED BY THE PROFESSIONAL COURIERS AS CHALAN NO.2588912. EXT.P-5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 5 12.2012 ISSUED BY THE PROFESSIONAL COURIERS AS CHALAN NO.2588913. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE LSN P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C) No. 2622 of 2013 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 29th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayers : i. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and pass orders on Exts. P1 to P3 representations submitted b the petitioners, forthwith, without an further delay. ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the first respondent to initiate action against the 4th respondent under Section 13 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 iii. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance as projected in this writ petition has also been highlighted by way of Exts. P1 to P3 before the first respondent. It is also stated that the petitioners will be satisfied, if a direction is W.P.(C) No. 2622 of 2013 :

2. : given to the first respondent to have said representations considered and finalized within a reasonable time.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case for the time being. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts. P1 to P3 in accordance with law; after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, the 4th respondent and also to other affected parties, if any; at the earliest, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for further steps. Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial