Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Francis Vs. Jessy

Francis vs Jessy

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Francis

Respondent

Jessy

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice thomas p.joseph tuesday, the 29th day of january 2013 9th magha 193 op(c).no. 355 of 2013 (o) ------------------------- against the judgment in cma.14/2011 of additional subordinate court, irinjalakuda dated 31 10-2012. petitioner(s): ----------------------- francis, aged 4 years, s/o.valappi chakkunni, kizhakkae chalakkudy village and desom, mukundapuram taluk. by adv. sri.m.b.prajith respondent(s): ---------------------------- jessy, aged 3 years, d/o.valappi chakkunny and w/o.olattuppuram james, kizhakke chalakkudy village and desom, mukundapuram taluk pin 68030.this op (civil) having come up for admission on 29-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: thomas p. joseph, j.===================== original petition (civil) no. 355 of 2013 ============================== dated this the 29th day of january, 2013 judgment learned counsel for petitioner has sought permission to withdraw this original petition without prejudice to his right to challenge the judgment in cma no. 14 of 2011 which has already worked out by non-payment of cost within the time stipulated. learned counsel submits that the petitioner intends to file a civil revision petition against that judgment.2. in view of the submission made by the learned counsel, i am inclined to grant permission sought for. resultantly, without prejudice to other rights as are available to the petitioner against the judgment in cma no. 14 of 2011, this original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- thomas p.joseph, judge smv //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 9TH MAGHA 193 OP(C).No. 355 of 2013 (O) ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CMA.14/2011 of ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 31 10-2012. PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- FRANCIS, AGED 4 YEARS, S/O.VALAPPI CHAKKUNNI, KIZHAKKAE CHALAKKUDY VILLAGE AND DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- JESSY, AGED 3 YEARS, D/O.VALAPPI CHAKKUNNY AND W/O.OLATTUPPURAM JAMES, KIZHAKKE CHALAKKUDY VILLAGE AND DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK PIN 68030.THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

===================== Original Petition (civil) No. 355 of 2013 ============================== Dated this the 29th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for petitioner has sought permission to withdraw this original petition without prejudice to his right to challenge the judgment in CMA No. 14 of 2011 which has already worked out by non-payment of cost within the time stipulated. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner intends to file a civil revision petition against that judgment.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel, I am inclined to grant permission sought for. Resultantly, without prejudice to other rights as are available to the petitioner against the judgment in CMA No. 14 of 2011, this original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE smv //True copy// P.A. To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial