Abdul Wahid Vs. Salim

Abdul Wahid vs Salim

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 29, 2013

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1013381

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1013381
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon
Decided On: Jan 29, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Wahid

Respondent

Salim

Excerpt

.....day delivered the following: p.r. ramachandra menon, j.--------------------------------------- w.p.(c). no. 1071 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 29th day of january, 2013 judgment the petitioner has approached this court with the following prayers: i) to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other direction to the respondent nos. 23 and 24 to consider and take appropriate action on ext.p9 complaint and direct them to enforce ext.p7 order maintain the law and order. ii) to issue a direction to the respondent no. 22 to implement ext.p7 order and adequate action to stall the convening of annual general body meeting as per ext.p8 on 13.01.2012 or any date thereafter or any activity in connection therewith. iii) to issue a direction to respondent no.22 to issue direction to the respondents nos. 1 to 21 to abstain from calling for any general body meeting or talking any policy decision concerning the wakf without the permission of the wakf board. iv) to issue a direction to the respondent 22 to take over the administration of the wakf in question and appoint an interim muthavally till the disposal of ext.p1. v) to issue a direction to the respondent 22 w.p.c. no. 1071 of 2013 -2- to appoint a returning officer to conduct election to the wakf in question adhering to democratic principles." 2. when the matter was taken up for consideration on 14.1.2013 there was no representation for the petitioner. today also the position is not different. it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action. the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. p.r. ramachandra menon, judge. kp/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 9TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 1071 of 2013 (H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ABDUL WAHID AGED 5 YEARS AGED 5 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED HANEEFA RESIDING AT MAKOM, VIKAS NAGAR (VNRA-83) SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017. BY ADVS.SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM SMT.NASEEHA BEEGUM P.S. SRI.MUDASSER AHAMED SRI.P.N.SAIBEN NIKKISH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SALIM AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O. ALI, ALIF C.V. NAGAR, CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ”

017.

2. SHAMNAD, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O.PEERUKANNU, RESIDING AT ALIF C.V. NAGAR, KADAYIL VEEDU, CHAVADIMUKKU SREEKARIYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ”

017.

3. RASHEED VALIYAPADIKKAL AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O SHAHUL HAMEED, AJAMAL MANZIL ROSE NAGAR, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAUPRAM - 695017.

4. SHAHUL HAMEED AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, S/O. ALIYAR KUNJU PONGUMOODU HOUSE, CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM”

017.

5. REGI MON AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL KANI, DARUSSALAM MANKUZHI, PANGAPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM”

017. WP(C).No. 1071 of 2013 (H) ::

2. ::

6. NISSAR A. AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O. ALI, BILAL MANZIL C.V. NAGAR, CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ”

017.

7. SHAJAHAN AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O.IBRAHIM, ASHIRWAD SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ”

017.

8. JAMAL AGED 5 YEARS, S/O. ABOOBACKER, MANTHARAVILAKO CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

9. RASHEED AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL KAREEM, FATHIMA MANZIL CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

10. RAHIM KATTIL AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED HANEEFA THEKKEVILAKAM, MUTTOM PARAMBATHU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

11. BABU AZIZ AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL AZIZI, SABU MANIL CHAVADIKUMMU, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

12. SHAFI S. AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O.SALAHUDEEN, MEKKONATTU VEEDU PANGAPARA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

13. NISSAR AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, S/O. NOOHU, NEROTTIL VEEDU C.V. NAGAR, CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

14. SHAJI AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, S/O. PICCA KANNU THANNIMOOTTIL VEEDU, CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

15. SAINULABIDEEN AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED KANNU, TANVIR GANDIPURAM, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

16. ABDUL SALAM AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, S/O. SAINALABDEEN, SUBIN MANZIL VIKAS NAGAR, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017. WP(C).No. 1071 of 2013 (H) ::

3. ::

17. RAHIM A.A. AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, S/O. ALIKUNJU, SHAMINA MANZIL CHAVADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

18. MOHAMMED TAHA AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, S/O. YOUSUF, TAHA MANZIL CHA\VADIMUKKU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

19. ABDUL RASHEED AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, SHEJEEN NIVAS, CHEKKALAMUKKU SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

20. SAFARULLAH AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, NIAZ MANZIL, ROSE GARDEN SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

21. MOHAMMED MAHEEN AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED KUNJU PALLIVILA VEEDU, SREEKARIYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 017.

22. THE KERALA WAKF BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NEAR INTERNATIONAL STADIUM, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM.

23. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

24. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 1071 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: i) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other direction to the respondent Nos. 23 and 24 to consider and take appropriate action on Ext.P9 complaint and direct them to enforce Ext.P7 order maintain the law and order. ii) To issue a direction to the respondent No. 22 to implement Ext.P7 order and adequate action to stall the convening of annual general body meeting as per Ext.P8 on 13.01.2012 or any date thereafter or any activity in connection therewith. Iii) To issue a direction to respondent No.22 to issue direction to the respondents Nos. 1 to 21 to abstain from calling for any general body meeting or talking any policy decision concerning the wakf without the permission of the Wakf Board. iv) To issue a direction to the respondent 22 to take over the administration of the Wakf in question and appoint an interim Muthavally till the disposal of Ext.P1. v) To issue a direction to the respondent 22 W.P.C. No. 1071 of 2013 -2- to appoint a returning officer to conduct election to the Wakf in question adhering to democratic principles." 2. When the matter was taken up for consideration on 14.1.2013 there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also the position is not different. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action. The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. Kp/-

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Abdul Wahid vs Salim Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon

Education

Abdul Wahid Vs. Salim

Brief this judgment before chambers

Case Summary

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Respondent

Excerpt

Full Judgment

Continue Your Research

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.