Kunjumon Vs. the Regional Transport Authority, Ernakulam

Kunjumon vs The Regional Transport Authority, Ernakulam

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 01, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012972

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1012972
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh
Decided On: Feb 01, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kunjumon

Respondent

The Regional Transport Authority, Ernakulam

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh friday, the 1st day of february 2013 12th magha 193 wp(c).no. 3067 of 2013 (g) -------------------------- petitioner(s): ------------- kunjumon k.v., s/o.varkey,kozhippattu house,thuruthissery maikkad p.o.,ankamaly. by adv. sri.p.deepak respondent(s): -------------- 1. the regional transport authority, ernakulam ”030. 2. the secretary, regional transport authority,ernakulam ”030. r by sr. government pleader p.m.saneer. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 01-02-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: appendix in w.p.(c) no.3067 of 201.petitioner(s) exhibits exhibit p1. a true copy of the regular permit issued to kl-07/an 143.valid till 28 12.2011. exhibit p2. a true copy of order of the 1st respondent dated 22 02.2010. exhibit p3. true copy of the judgment dated 14 11.2012 in mvaa no.108/10. exhibit p4. a true copy of temporary permit issued to kl-01/x 272.valid till 14 01.2013. exhibit p5. a true copy of order of the 1st respondent dated 29 11.2012. //true copy// p.s. to judge. v.chitambaresh, j.------------------------------- w.p.(c) no. 3067 of 2013 ------------------------------- dated this the 1st day of february, 2013 judgment the petitioner contends that the regular permit has so far not been issued by the respondents despite ext.p3 judgment of the state transport appellate tribunal.2. i direct the first respondent to grant the regular permit to the petitioner in terms of ext.p3 judgment within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.3. there is no reason as to why the petitioner shall be denied a temporary permit to operate on the same route pending the grant and issue of regular permit. the second respondent shall therefore issue a temporary permit to operate the service in the interregnum. the writ petition is disposed of. v.chitambaresh, judge. nj.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 12TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 3067 of 2013 (G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- KUNJUMON K.V., S/O.VARKEY,KOZHIPPATTU HOUSE,THURUTHISSERY MAIKKAD P.O.,ANKAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM ”

030.

2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,ERNAKULAM ”

030. R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER P.M.SANEER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) NO.3067 OF 201.PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1. A TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO KL-07/AN 143.VALID TILL 28 12.2011. EXHIBIT P2. A TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22 02.2010. EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14 11.2012 IN MVAA NO.108/10. EXHIBIT P4. A TRUE COPY OF TEMPORARY PERMIT ISSUED TO KL-01/X 272.VALID TILL 14 01.2013. EXHIBIT P5. A TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29 11.2012. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 3067 of 2013 ------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2013 JUDGMENT

The petitioner contends that the regular permit has so far not been issued by the respondents despite Ext.P3 judgment of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal.

2. I direct the first respondent to grant the regular permit to the petitioner in terms of Ext.P3 judgment within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3. There is no reason as to why the petitioner shall be denied a temporary permit to operate on the same route pending the grant and issue of regular permit. The second respondent shall therefore issue a temporary permit to operate the service in the interregnum. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge. nj.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2013 Same Parties Kunjumon vs The Regional Transport Authority, Ernakulam Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh