Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sathy Vs. G.Harikumar

Sathy vs G.Harikumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 01, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012888

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sathy

Respondent

G.Harikumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice k.surendra mohan friday, the 1st day of february 2013 12th magha 193 con.case(c).no. 1776 of 2012 (s) in wp(c).129/2011 --------------------------------------------------- against the order/judgment in wp(c).129/2011 of high court of kerala dated 14 12-2011 petitioner: ----------- sathy, aged 5 years w/o. sukumaran chettiyar, residing at lal nivas, aryankavu.p.o., kollam. by advs.sri.m.ramaswamy pillai sri.p.m.joseph respondent: ----------- g.harikumar, age and father's name not known to the petitioner, the chief forest conservator(administration), forest head quarters, vazhuthacaud, trivandrum-695 001. r by government pleader sri james kurian this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 01-02-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: k.surendra mohan, j.----------------------------------------------------- cont.case no.1776 of 2012-s in w.p(c) no.129 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- dated this the 1st february, 2013 judgment a memo has been submitted by the learned senior government pleader producing order not h2-21223/10 dated 19.01.2013, passed in compliance with the direction issued by this court. since the directions of this court have been complied with, there are no grounds to continue this contempt case. the same is accordingly closed, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the order if she is aggrieved by the same. (k.surendra mohan, judge) rtr/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 12TH MAGHA 193 Con.Case(C).No. 1776 of 2012 (S) IN WP(C).129/2011 --------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).129/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14 12-2011 PETITIONER: ----------- SATHY, AGED 5 YEARS W/O. SUKUMARAN CHETTIYAR, RESIDING AT LAL NIVAS, ARYANKAVU.P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAMASWAMY PILLAI SRI.P.M.JOSEPH RESPONDENT: ----------- G.HARIKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR(ADMINISTRATION), FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI JAMES KURIAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

----------------------------------------------------- Cont.Case No.1776 of 2012-S in W.P(c) No.129 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st February, 2013 JUDGMENT

A memo has been submitted by the learned Senior Government Pleader producing order not H2-21223/10 dated 19.01.2013, passed in compliance with the direction issued by this Court. Since the directions of this Court have been complied with, there are no grounds to continue this Contempt Case. The same is accordingly closed, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the order if she is aggrieved by the same. (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial