Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 12TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 18108 of 2012 (K) ------------------------------ - -- --- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- MR.NIZAMUDDIN AGED 5 YEARS S/O.HANEEFA RAVUTHAR,PALLATHU,MEENKARA MUTHALAMADA,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISH R. MENON SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER THE FEDERAL BANK LTD.,ERNAKULAM NORTH BRANCH (AUTHORIZED OFFICER).682 018.
2. MR.VEERANKUTTY HAJI, S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN HAJI, RESIDING AT VELAPPAN HOUSE, NILAMPATHY DESOM, AMARAMBALAM P.O.,NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 679332. (NOW RESIDING AT 37/2605 C NILAVERATH LANE,AZAD ROAD,KALOOR, KOCHI-682017).
3. FASALULABID S/O.HAMSA HAJI,RESIDING AT PULLISSERY (H) KAMBALAKKALLU P.O.,VAZHIKKADAVU,NILAMBUR MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 679333. (PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 37/2605C NILAVERATH LANE,AZAD ROAD,KALOOR, KOCHI-682017).
4. ABDUL KARIM S/O.HYDROSE,ONATHUKATTIL,KADAMPUZHA P.O. VALANCHERRY,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN 676553.
5. HAMSA.P. S/O.ABOOBACKER,PULLISSERY HOUSE,KAMBALAKKALLU P.O. VAZHIKKADAVU,NILAMBU,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 676553. R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.ANTONY R1 BY ADV. SMT.LEELAMMA ANTONY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.18108/2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1:- TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER'S 4TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION HALL TICKET. EXHIBIT P2:- TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION. EXHIBIT P3:- TRUE COPY OF CHALAN RECEIPT SHOWING THE REMITTANCE OF RE- VALUATION FEE OF PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18 8.2010 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WPC 26047/2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC,J -------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18108 of 2012 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2013 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed challenging the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner. On behalf of the Bank, the counsel has filed memo dated 23.01.2013 reporting that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the petitioner has filed S.A.No.4 of 2013 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Now that the petitioner has already availed the statutory remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, nothing further survives to be considered in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ln