Faizal Vs. the State of Kerala

Faizal vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 19, 2012

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012659

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1012659
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan
Decided On: Dec 19, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Faizal

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....and r3 as per order dated 19 12.2012 in crl.m.a.no.7900/2012 in b.a 8920/2012) r2,r3 by adv. sri.m.t.sureshkumar r2,r3 by adv. sri.v.v.raja by public prosecutor sri.v.sreejith this bail application having come up for admission on 19-12-2012, the court on the same day passed the following: mns p.bhavadasan, j ----------------------------------------- b.a no.8920 of 2012 --------------------------------------------------- dated this the 19th day of december, 2012 order the learned counsel for the defacto complainant submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and he has no further grievance in the matter. accordingly, the petition is allowed as follows: i) the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on or before 28.12.2012, who after interrogation shall produce him before the jfcm concerned and on application for bail moved by the petitioner, the learned magistrate shall release the petitioner on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of rs.15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the said court. ii) the learned magistrate shall ensure the identity of the sureties and also the veracity of the tax receipts before granting bail. iii) the petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer concerned for interrogation as and when required by him until further orders. iv) the petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witness. v) if any of the condition is violated, the bail granted shall stand cancelled and the jfcm concerned, on being satisfied of the said fact, may take such proceedings as are available to him in law. p.bhavadasan judge ab

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 28TH AGRAHAYANA 193 Bail Appl..No. 8920 of 2012 () ------------------------------ (CRIME NO.272 OF 201.OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT) CRMP.3092/2012 of SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1: ----------------------- FAIZAL, AGED 3 YEARS S/O.A.K.SHAHUL HAMEED, GREEN LAND, THEJAS NAGAR-141 THATTAMALA.P.O, ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. (CRIME NO.272 OF 201.OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION KOLLAM). *ADDL.R2 & R3 IMPLEADED. ADDL.R2:SHAJAHAN, S/O.ABDUL KHADER, AGED 53 SANOOJA MANZIL, KULAPPADAM, MATTAKKAVUCHERRY, NEDUMPARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM ADDL.R3:SAJINA W/O.SHAJAHAN, AGED 49 SANOOJA MANZIL, KULAPPADAM, MATTAKKAVUCHERRY, NEDUMPARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM (*IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R2 AND R3 AS PER ORDER DATED 19 12.2012 IN CRL.M.A.NO.7900/2012 IN B.A 8920/2012) R2,R3 BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR R2,R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: MNS P.BHAVADASAN, J ----------------------------------------- B.A No.8920 of 2012 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December, 2012 ORDER

The learned counsel for the defacto complainant submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and he has no further grievance in the matter. Accordingly, the petition is allowed as follows: i) The petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer on or before 28.12.2012, who after interrogation shall produce him before the JFCM concerned and on application for bail moved by the petitioner, the learned Magistrate shall release the petitioner on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the said Court. ii) The learned Magistrate shall ensure the identity of the sureties and also the veracity of the tax receipts before granting bail. Iii) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer concerned for interrogation as and when required by him until further orders. iv) The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witness. v) If any of the condition is violated, the bail granted shall stand cancelled and the JFCM concerned, on being satisfied of the said fact, may take such proceedings as are available to him in law. P.BHAVADASAN Judge ab

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties Faizal vs The State of Kerala Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan