Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Radha Vs. State of Kerala

Radha vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 19, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012527

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radha

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....r.s.no.200/8 of thrikkadavoor village, belonging to the claimant, was acquired for the purpose of national highway bye-pass, kollam. notification under section 4(1) of the land acquisition act was published on 26.2.1996. award was passed on 2.2.1999. the land acquisition officer awarded land value at the rate of `21,927/- per are. dissatisfied with the amount awarded, the claimant filed application under section 18 of the land acquisition act. on reference as l.a.r.no.14 of 2001 on the file of the additional sub court, kollam, the land value was enhanced by `15,073/- per are, over and above l.a.a. no. 708 of 201.b ::2. :: the amount awarded by the land acquisition officer. the other statutory benefits were also granted to the claimant. the claimant is not satisfied with the amount awarded by the land acquisition court. it is submitted that in l.a.a.no.495 of 2012, which arose from a similar case where the land was acquired for the same purpose, a division bench of this court enhanced the land value and re-fixed the same at `65,000/- per are. for parity of reasons, we are of the view that the land value in the present case is also liable to be re- fixed at `65,000/- per are.3. accordingly, the land acquisition appeal is allowed in part and the land value is re-fixed at `65,000/- per are. the appellant would be entitled to get proportionate costs also. while computing the interest payable, the appellant would not be entitled to claim interest under section 28 of the land acquisition act on the enhanced compensation, for a period of 1368 days, as ordered while condoning the delay of 1368 days in filing the appeal. l.a.a. no. 708 of 201.b ::3. :: registry will issue copy of the judgment and prepare the decree only after the appellant pays the balance court fee. (k.t.sankaran) judge (m.l.joseph francis) judge ahz/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 28TH AGRAHAYANA 193 LA.App..No. 708 of 2012 (B) LAR.NO.14/2001 OF ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM APPELLANT/CLAIMANT: ------------------------------- RADHA CHITTEZHATHU PADINJATTATHIL VEEDU, NEERAVIL, THRIKKADAVOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT: STATE: -------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM-690 013. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADER THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.

---------------------------------------------------- L.A.A. NO. 708 OF 201.B ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December, 2012 JUDGMENT K.T.Sankaran, J.

The claimant in L.A.R.No.14 of 2001 on the file of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Kollam is the appellant.

2. An extent of 13 Ares of land in R.S.No.200/8 of Thrikkadavoor Village, belonging to the claimant, was acquired for the purpose of National Highway Bye-pass, Kollam. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published on 26.2.1996. Award was passed on 2.2.1999. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at the rate of `21,927/- per Are. Dissatisfied with the amount awarded, the claimant filed application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. On reference as L.A.R.No.14 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kollam, the land value was enhanced by `15,073/- per Are, over and above L.A.A. NO. 708 OF 201.B ::

2. :: the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. The other statutory benefits were also granted to the claimant. The claimant is not satisfied with the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Court. It is submitted that in L.A.A.No.495 of 2012, which arose from a similar case where the land was acquired for the same purpose, a Division Bench of this Court enhanced the land value and re-fixed the same at `65,000/- per Are. For parity of reasons, we are of the view that the land value in the present case is also liable to be re- fixed at `65,000/- per Are.

3. Accordingly, the Land Acquisition Appeal is allowed in part and the land value is re-fixed at `65,000/- per Are. The appellant would be entitled to get proportionate costs also. While computing the interest payable, the appellant would not be entitled to claim interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on the enhanced compensation, for a period of 1368 days, as ordered while condoning the delay of 1368 days in filing the appeal. L.A.A. NO. 708 OF 201.B ::

3. :: Registry will issue copy of the judgment and prepare the decree only after the appellant pays the balance court fee. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge ahz/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial