Raheem Vs. State of Kerala

Raheem vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 31, 2012

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012444

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1012444
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan
Decided On: Dec 31, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raheem

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....falsely implicated with ulterior motive. according to them, they have not committed any act as alleged.3. after having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned public prosecutor and after having perused the records, it is felt that extraordinary jurisdiction needs to be exercised in favour of the petitioners. the petition is allowed as follows: i) the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on or before 9.1.2013, who after interrogation shall produce them before the jfcm concerned and on applications for bail moved by the petitioners, the learned magistrate shall release the petitioners on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the said court. b.a no.9536 of 2012 :2. ii) the learned magistrate shall ensure the identity of the sureties and also the veracity of the tax receipts before granting bail. iii) the petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer concerned for interrogation as and when required by him until further orders. iv) the petitioners shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witness. v) if any of the condition is violated, the bail granted shall stand cancelled and the jfcm concerned, on being satisfied of the said fact, may take such proceedings as are available to him in law. p.bhavadasan judge ab

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 10TH POUSHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 9536 of 2012 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO.3401/2012 OF KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 5.------------------------------------------------------------ 1. RAHEEM, S/O.ABDULKHADERKUNJU, MEZHUVELIL VEEDU, KADATHOOR, K.S.PURAM.

2. SHIBINA, W/O.RAHEEM, MEZHUVELIL VEEDU, KADATHOOR, K.S.PURAM.

3. SHAHUDHEEN, S/O.ABDULKHADERKUNJU, MEZHUVELIL VEEDU, KADATHOOR, K.S.PURAM.

4. EBRAHIM KUTTY, S/O.ABDULKHADERKUNJU, MEZHUVELIL VEEDU, KADATHOOR,K.S.PURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.K.SIJU SMT.CHITHRA.S.BABU RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, (THROUGH THE S.I. OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION) REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.PIN-682 031 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts P.BHAVADASAN, J ----------------------------------------- B.A No.9536 of 2012 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of December, 2012 ORDER

The petitioners are accused Nos.2 to 5 in Crime No.3401/2012 of Karunagappally Police Station for having committed offence punishable under Section 498(A), 323 and 34 IPC.

2. The petitioners would say that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated with ulterior motive. According to them, they have not committed any act as alleged.

3. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor and after having perused the records, it is felt that extraordinary jurisdiction needs to be exercised in favour of the petitioners. The petition is allowed as follows: i) The petitioners shall surrender before the Investigating Officer on or before 9.1.2013, who after interrogation shall produce them before the JFCM concerned and on applications for bail moved by the petitioners, the learned Magistrate shall release the petitioners on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the said Court. B.A No.9536 of 2012 :

2. ii) The learned Magistrate shall ensure the identity of the sureties and also the veracity of the tax receipts before granting bail. Iii) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer concerned for interrogation as and when required by him until further orders. iv) The petitioners shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witness. v) If any of the condition is violated, the bail granted shall stand cancelled and the JFCM concerned, on being satisfied of the said fact, may take such proceedings as are available to him in law. P.BHAVADASAN Judge ab

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties Raheem vs State of Kerala Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan