Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pathrose N.J Vs. Assistant Registrar Co-operative So-

Pathrose N.J vs Assistant Registrar Co-operative So-

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 31, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012391

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pathrose N.J

Respondent

Assistant Registrar Co-operative So-

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice p.n.ravindran monday, the 31st day of december 2012 10th pousha 193 wp(c).no. 1847 of 2009 (t) -------------------------- petitioner(s): ------------- pathrose.n.j, aged 6 years, s/o. late yohannan, naduthundathil house (vandavathel), karumaloor.p.o, kanakkary village kottayam district. by advs. sri.a.x.varghese sri.a.v.jojo respondent(s): -------------- 1. assistant registrar, co-operative society office, meenachil, pala.2. special sale officer, office of the assistant registrar, co-operative society, meenachil pala.3. manager, kanakkary service co-operative bank, vempally.p.o, kottayam.4. kerala agricutural debt relief commission, thiruvananthapuram. r3 by adv. sri.shaji thomas porkkattil r3 by adv. sri.t.v.vinu r1 by government pleader smt. sareena george this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 31-12-2012, the court on the same day delivered the following: ds p.n.ravindran, j.-------------------------------------- w.p.(c) no.1847 of 2009 --------------------------------------- dated this the 31st day of december, 2012 judgment the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 19.12.2012 requesting the registry to post the case before the bench as it become infructuous. when the writ petition was called on for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was not present. there was also no representation on his behalf. in such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- p.n.ravindran, judge. rkc // true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 10TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 1847 of 2009 (T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- PATHROSE.N.J, AGED 6 YEARS, S/O. LATE YOHANNAN, NADUTHUNDATHIL HOUSE (VANDAVATHEL), KARUMALOOR.P.O, KANAKKARY VILLAGE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OFFICE, MEENACHIL, PALA.

2. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MEENACHIL PALA.

3. MANAGER, KANAKKARY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, VEMPALLY.P.O, KOTTAYAM.

4. KERALA AGRICUTURAL DEBT RELIEF COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R3 BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL R3 BY ADV. SRI.T.V.VINU R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SAREENA GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ds P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.1847 of 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of December, 2012 JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 19.12.2012 requesting the Registry to post the case before the Bench as it become infructuous. When the writ petition was called on for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was not present. There was also no representation on his behalf. In such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. Rkc // true copy// PA to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial