Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ashraf A.M. Vs. District Police Complaint Authority

Ashraf A.M. vs District Police Complaint Authority

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 31, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashraf A.M.

Respondent

District Police Complaint Authority

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice k.m.joseph & the honourable mr.justice k.harilal monday, the 31st day of december 2012 10th pousha 193 wp(c).no. 30387 of 2012 (w) --------------------------- petitioner(s)/petitioner: ------------------------ ashraf a.m., aged 6 years s/o.mohammed fathima,thacheri vilakom house, edava thiruvananthapuram-695311 by adv. sri.denizen komath respondent(s): -------------- 1. district police complaint authority thiruvananthapuram, rep.by its secretary -695001.2. director general of police, kerala police, thiruvananthapuram -695001 3. siva prasad, sub inspector of police, varkala police station thiruvananthapuram -695141 4. mohammed haris, s/o.ishaq, eeerath veedu, manthepacha post kallambalam, varkala, thiruvananthapuram -695141 r1 & r2 by adv.sri p c iype (addl. advocate general) by sr. government pleader sri cyriac kurian. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31-12-2012, the court on the same day delivered the following: lsn wp(c).no. 30387 of 2012 (w) appendix petitioner(s) exhibits ext.p1:- true photocopy of the sale agreement entered in between petitioener and intended purchasers dtd 28/11/11 ext.p2:- true photocopy of the sale agreement executed further in between parties ext.p3:- true photocopy of the receipt of acceptance of cheque ext.p4:- true photocopy of the lawyer notice preferred by the intended purchsers to the petitioner. ext.p5:- true photocopy of the reply notice. ext.p6:- true phtotocopy of the complaint preferred by the 4th respondent befor ethe 3 d respondent dtd 30/10/2012 ext.p7:- true photocopy of the impugned agreement created at the instance of the 3rd respondent. ext.p8:- true photocopy of the complaint lodged by the petitioner before the ist respondent authority. ext.p9:- true photocopy of the circular issued by the state police chief vide circular number 4 2012. respondents' exhibits : nil //true copy/ p.a to judge lsn k.m.joseph & k.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 10TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 30387 of 2012 (W) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: ------------------------ ASHRAF A.M., AGED 6 YEARS S/O.MOHAMMED FATHIMA,THACHERI VILAKOM HOUSE, EDAVA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695311 BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. DISTRICT POLICE COMPLAINT AUTHORITY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY -695001.

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695001 3. SIVA PRASAD, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695141 4. MOHAMMED HARIS, S/O.ISHAQ, EEERATH VEEDU, MANTHEPACHA POST KALLAMBALAM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695141 R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI P C IYPE (ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL) BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI CYRIAC KURIAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: LSN WP(C).No. 30387 of 2012 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE AGREEMENT ENTERED IN BETWEEN PETITIOENER AND INTENDED PURCHASERS DTD 28/11/11 EXT.P2:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE AGREEMENT EXECUTED FURTHER IN BETWEEN PARTIES EXT.P3:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT OF ACCEPTANCE OF CHEQUE EXT.P4:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE PREFERRED BY THE INTENDED PURCHSERS TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE. EXT.P6:- TRUE PHTOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEFOR ETHE 3 D RESPONDENT DTD 30/10/2012 EXT.P7:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE IMPUGNED AGREEMENT CREATED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P8:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT AUTHORITY. EXT.P9:- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CIRCULAR ISSUED BY THE STATE POLICE CHIEF VIDE CIRCULAR NUMBER 4 2012. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE LSN K.M.JOSEPH & K. HARILAL, JJ.

------------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.30387 of 2012-W ----------------------------------------- Dated, this the 31st day of December, 2012 JUDGMENT

K.M.Joseph, J.

Petitioner has approached this Court complaining of alleged harassment by the police officer.

2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that, no crime has been registered and there will be no harassment of the petitioner. We record the said submission and dispose of the writ petition. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. ( K. HARILAL) JUDGE. MS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial