Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hydrose Vs. State of Kerala

Hydrose vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 31, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012366

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hydrose

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr. justice t.r. ramachandran nair monday, the 31st day of december 2012 10th pousha 193 wp(c). no. 27797 of 2012 (y) --------------------------- petitioner: ---------- hydrose, aged 6 years s/o. peeru mohammed 23 26, fabsa manzil, beach road, thengapattanam.p.o., tamilnadu. by adv. sri. saju. s.a respondents: ----------- 1. state of kerala represented by secretary department of home, government secretariat thiruvananthapuram-695 001.2. the city police commissioner office of the city police commissioner vazhuthakkad, thiruvananthapuram-695 001.3. circle inspector of police fort police station, fort, thiruvananthapuram-69”4. shafi, s/o. khan sahib, t.c. 41/1594, kalippankulam manakkad thiruvananthapuram, pin-695 018. r1 by state attorney sri. p.a. vijaya raghavan this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31-12-2012, the court on the same day delivered the following: sp t.r. ramachandran nair, j.--------------------------------------- w.p.(c) no.27797 of 201.--------------------------------------- dated this the 31st day of december, 2012. judgment learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after the passing of the interim order dated 12.12.2012, the police have registered a crime.2. heard the learned state attorney. it is submitted that the matter has become infructuous. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. t.r. ramachandran nair judge smp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 10TH POUSHA 193 WP(C). No. 27797 of 2012 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------- HYDROSE, AGED 6 YEARS S/O. PEERU MOHAMMED 23 26, FABSA MANZIL, BEACH ROAD, THENGAPATTANAM.P.O., TAMILNADU. BY ADV. SRI. SAJU. S.A RESPONDENTS: ----------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE FORT POLICE STATION, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-69”

4. SHAFI, S/O. KHAN SAHIB, T.C. 41/1594, KALIPPANKULAM MANAKKAD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 018. R1 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI. P.A. VIJAYA RAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.27797 OF 201.--------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of December, 2012. JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after the passing of the interim order dated 12.12.2012, the Police have registered a crime.

2. Heard the learned State Attorney. It is submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial