Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ksrtc Vs. Rta,kozhikode

Ksrtc vs Rta,kozhikode

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 11, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012342

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ksrtc

Respondent

Rta,kozhikode

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice b.p.ray friday, the 11th day of january 2013 21st pousha 193 wp(c).no. 12600 of 2008 (y) --------------------------- petitioner(s): -------------------------- kerala state transport corporation represented by its managing director transport bhavan, east fort,thiruvananthapuram by advs. shri.johnson p.john, sc, ksrtc shri p.benjamin paul,sc, ksrtc sri.babu joseph kuruvathazha,sc,ksrtc respondent(s): --------------- 1. the regional transport authority kozhikode represented by its secretary 2 the secretary regional transport authority, kozhikode .3. m.abdulla kutty,mangadan house cherusala,kottakkal,malappuram 4 the regional transport authority malappuram, represented by its secretary r,r3 by adv. sri.k.v.gopinathan nair r by government pleader sri.thomas john ambookan this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 11-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: su/- b.p.ray,j.-------------------------------------------------- w.p.(c) .no.12600 of 2008 --------------------------------------------------- dated this the 11th day of january, 2013 judgment on a reading of the prayers in the writ petition, it appears to me that the writ petition has become infructuous. accordingly, it is closed. b.p.ray, judge su/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 21ST POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 12600 of 2008 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- KERALA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC SHRI P.BENJAMIN PAUL,SC, KSRTC SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA,SC,KSRTC RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2 THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE .

3. M.ABDULLA KUTTY,MANGADAN HOUSE CHERUSALA,KOTTAKKAL,MALAPPURAM 4 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SU/- B.P.RAY,J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) .No.12600 of 2008 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT On a reading of the prayers in the writ petition, it appears to me that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, it is closed. B.P.RAY, JUDGE Su/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial