Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Muneer Vs. the Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad

Abdul Muneer vs The Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 08, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012149

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Muneer

Respondent

The Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice v.chitambaresh tuesday, the 8th day of january 2013 18th pousha 193 wp(c).no. 670 of 2013 (g) ------------------------- petitioner(s): ------------- abdul muneer, puliyancheri house, p.o ramanattukara kozhikode district. by advs.sri.g.prabhakaran smt.r.padmakumari respondent(s): -------------- 1. the regional transport authority, palakkad, represented by its secretary”001. 2. the secretary regional transport authority, palakkad 67 001. by senior government pleader sri. p.m. saneer this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 08-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 670/2013 appendix petitioner(s) exhibits exhibit p1. true copy of the temporary permit application filed by the petitioner dated 29 11.2012. exhibit p2. true copy of the covering letter filed by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent dated 29 11.2012. exhibit p3. true copy of the acknoledgment receipt of money dated 29 11.12. respondents' exhibits : nil /true copy/ p.a. to judge. v. chitambaresh, j -------------------------------- wp(c) no. 670 of 201.------------------------------------ dated this the 8th day of january, 2013 judgment the only prayer urged at the time of hearing is for a direction to consider the application for temporary permit for the petitioner to operate his stage carriage on the route malampuzha - kozhikode. the government pleader points out that the regular permit issued to another in respect of the stage carriage bearing registration no. kl 10/t 978.is under suspended animation who has also to be heard in the exercise.2. i direct the second respondent to consider ext. p1 application for temporary permit within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. the petitioner as well as the holder of the regular permit on the same route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise. the writ petition is disposed of. v. chitambaresh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 18TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 670 of 2013 (G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- ABDUL MUNEER, PULIYANCHERI HOUSE, P.O RAMANATTUKARA KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY”

001.

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD 67 001. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.M. SANEER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 670/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29 11.2012. EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29 11.2012. EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOLEDGMENT RECEIPT OF MONEY DATED 29 11.12. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 670 OF 201.------------------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT The only prayer urged at the time of hearing is for a direction to consider the application for temporary permit for the petitioner to operate his stage carriage on the route Malampuzha - Kozhikode. The Government Pleader points out that the regular permit issued to another in respect of the stage carriage bearing registration No. KL 10/T 978.is under suspended animation who has also to be heard in the exercise.

2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext. P1 application for temporary permit within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner as well as the holder of the regular permit on the same route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial