Seals Vs. Alabama

Seals vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-08-1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101214

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101214
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-08-1965
Case Number: 380 U.S. 254
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Seals

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

seals v. alabama - 380 u.s. 254 (1965) u.s. supreme court seals v. alabama, 380 u.s. 254 (1965) 380 u.s. 254 seals v. alabama. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 465, misc. decided march 8, 1965. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 276 ala. 654, 165 so.2d 742. vernon crawford, morton stavis, martin r. bradley, jr., arthur kinoy and william m. kunstler for petitioner. richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama, and leslie hall, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the court is of the view that on the record the petitioner is an indigent. therefore, the judgment must be reversed. griffin v. illinois, 351 u.s. 12 . page 380 u.s. 254, 255

Full Judgment

SEALS v. ALABAMA - 380 U.S. 254 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court SEALS v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 254 (1965) 380 U.S. 254

SEALS v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 465, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 276 Ala. 654, 165 So.2d 742.

Vernon Crawford, Morton Stavis, Martin R. Bradley, Jr., Arthur Kinoy and William M. Kunstler for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The Court is of the view that on the record the petitioner is an indigent. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 .

Page 380 U.S. 254, 255

Same Parties Seals vs Alabama Same Subject Land Acquisition