Davis Vs. Mabry

Davis vs Mabry

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-08-1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101211

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101211
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-08-1965
Case Number: 380 U.S. 251
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Davis

Respondent

Mabry

Excerpt

davis v. mabry - 380 u.s. 251 (1965) u.s. supreme court davis v. mabry, 380 u.s. 251 (1965) 380 u.s. 251 davis, assessor-collector of taxes, bexar county, texas, et al. v. mabry et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of texas. no. 774. decided march 8, 1965. 232 f. supp. 930, affirmed. waggoner carr, attorney general of texas, hawthorne phillips, first assistant attorney general, mary k. wall, assistant attorney general, james e. barlow and preston h. dial, jr., for appellants. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. carrington v. rash, ante, p. 89. mr. justice harlan would reverse the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in carrington v. rash, ante, at 97. page 380 u.s. 251, 252

Full Judgment

DAVIS v. MABRY - 380 U.S. 251 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court DAVIS v. MABRY, 380 U.S. 251 (1965) 380 U.S. 251

DAVIS, ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL. v.
MABRY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 774.
Decided March 8, 1965.

232 F. Supp. 930, affirmed.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, James E. Barlow and Preston H. Dial, Jr., for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Carrington v. Rash, ante, p. 89.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would reverse the judgment of the District Court for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Carrington v. Rash, ante, at 97.

Page 380 U.S. 251, 252

Same Parties Davis vs Mabry Same Subject Land Acquisition