Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

E.Dhanesh Vs. State of Kerala

E.Dhanesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 08, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1012067

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

E.Dhanesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....petitioner's annexures: annex.1: copy of the order dtd. 4/12/2012 in cmp.no.6065/2012 in crime no.1183/2012 of the judicial first class magistrate's court, payyannur. respondent's annexures: n i l /true copy/ p.a.to judge kss t.r. ramachandran nair, j.--------------------------------------- crl. m.c. nos.92 & 93 of 201.--------------------------------------- dated this the 8th day of january, 2013. order in both the cases, the same accused has filed the crl.m.cs seeking for deletion of the condition to deposit rs.10,000/-, fixed by the judicial first class magistrate court, payyannur, as a condition for grant of bail. in crl.m.c.no.92/2013, seven conditions have been fixed and the condition no.2 is that the petitioner shall deposit rs.10,000/-before the court. similar order has been passed in crl.m.c.no.93/2013 also.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor.3. the case pleaded by the petitioner is that he is a coolie by profession and he is unable to comply with the condition to deposit rs.10,000/- each namely, rs.20,000/-. it is submitted that he has already completed 125 days after his arrest, in custody. learned public prosecutor submitted that the deletion of the condition sought for is not justified. crl.m.c.nos.92 & 93/2013 2 having regard to various aspects pointed out in the crl.m.cs and after considering the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is unable to comply with the condition as he is in a pathetic financial condition and not in a position to deposit the amount, the cash security of rs.10,000/- in both the cases is reduced to rs.2,500/- each and the condition in annexure i order in both the cases is modified to that extent. the crl. m.cs are allowed to the above extent. t.r. ramachandran nair judge smp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 18TH POUSHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 92 of 2013 () ------------------------ CMP.6065/2012 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PAYYANNUR .. (CRIME NO.1183/2012 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR) ........... PETITIONER(S):1ST ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------ E.DHANESH,AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.KUNHAMMED, ITTAMMAL THARAVAD, MADAYI AMSOM, PAYANGAD. BY ADV. SMT.K.DEEPA (PAYYANNUR) RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, PAYYANNUR-670 307. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. V.H.JASMINE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-01-2013 ALONG WITH CRMC. NO.93/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss CRMC.NO.92/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 4/12/2012 IN CMP.NO.6065/2012 IN CRIME NO.1183/2012 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE'S COURT, PAYYANNUR. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

--------------------------------------- Crl. M.C. Nos.92 & 93 OF 201.--------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of January, 2013. ORDER

In both the cases, the same accused has filed the Crl.M.Cs seeking for deletion of the condition to deposit Rs.10,000/-, fixed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur, as a condition for grant of bail. In Crl.M.C.No.92/2013, seven conditions have been fixed and the condition No.2 is that the petitioner shall deposit Rs.10,000/-before the court. Similar order has been passed in Crl.M.C.No.93/2013 also.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The case pleaded by the petitioner is that he is a coolie by profession and he is unable to comply with the condition to deposit Rs.10,000/- each namely, Rs.20,000/-. It is submitted that he has already completed 125 days after his arrest, in custody. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the deletion of the condition sought for is not justified. Crl.M.C.Nos.92 & 93/2013 2 Having regard to various aspects pointed out in the Crl.M.Cs and after considering the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is unable to comply with the condition as he is in a pathetic financial condition and not in a position to deposit the amount, the cash security of Rs.10,000/- in both the cases is reduced to Rs.2,500/- each and the condition in Annexure I order in both the cases is modified to that extent. The Crl. M.Cs are allowed to the above extent. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial