Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joy Vs. the State of Kerala and Others

Joy vs The State of Kerala and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 09, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011938

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joy

Respondent

The State of Kerala and Others

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice p.r.ramachandra menon wednesday, the 9th day of january 2013 19th pousha 193 wp(c).no. 9962 of 2010 (u) -------------------------- petitioner(s): ------------- joy, s/o.anthony, kadambattuparambil house, pariyaram desom-village, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district. by adv. sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) sri.k.ravi (pariyarath) respondent(s): -------------- 1. the state of kerala, rep. by the secretary to the govt., irrigation department, govt. secretariat, thiruvananthapuram.2. the district collector, collectorate, thrissur.3. the asst.executive engineer, irrigation sub division no.i, chalakudy.4. johny, s/o.payyappilly chacku, pariyaram village-desom, mukundapuram taluk thrissur district.5. poulose, s/o.pudussery thoman, pariyaram village-desom, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district.6. anthony, s/o.arakkal vareed, pariyaram village-desom, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district.7. subramaniachari, maliyamveettil, pariyaram village-desom, mukundapuram taluk, thrissur district. r1-r3 by smt.m.j.rajasree, government pleader r4-r7 by adv. sri.p.v.paulson this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 09-01-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: as p.r.ramachandra menon, j --------------------------------------- w.p. (c) no. 9962 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 9th day of january, 2013 judgment when the matter was taken up for consideration before this court on the last occasion i.e., on 04/01/2013, there was no representation. today also, the position is not different. it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action. the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. p.r.ramachandra menon, judge as

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 19TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 9962 of 2010 (U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- JOY, S/O.ANTHONY, KADAMBATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PARIYARAM DESOM-VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR.

3. THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SUB DIVISION NO.I, CHALAKUDY.

4. JOHNY, S/O.PAYYAPPILLY CHACKU, PARIYARAM VILLAGE-DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT.

5. POULOSE, S/O.PUDUSSERY THOMAN, PARIYARAM VILLAGE-DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

6. ANTHONY, S/O.ARAKKAL VAREED, PARIYARAM VILLAGE-DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

7. SUBRAMANIACHARI, MALIYAMVEETTIL, PARIYARAM VILLAGE-DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1-R3 BY SMT.M.J.RAJASREE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER R4-R7 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.PAULSON THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AS P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------------------- W.P. (C) NO. 9962 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for consideration before this Court on the last occasion i.e., on 04/01/2013, there was no representation. Today also, the position is not different. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action. The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE AS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial