Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A.S.Santhoshkumar Vs. State of Kerala

A.S.Santhoshkumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 28, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011552

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.S.Santhoshkumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....nagar, mundakkal west, kollam 69100 . by adv. sri.l.rajesh narayan iyer respondent(s)/complainant: -------------------------- state of kerala, represented by the sub inspector of police, kollam east police station, through public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. by public prosecutor sri. rajesh vijayan this bail application having come up for admission on 28-12-2012, the court on the same day passed the following: dsv/- babu mathew p. joseph, j.--------------------------------------------- b.a. no.9556 of 2012 --------------------------------------------- dated this the 28th day of december, 2012 order this application is filed under section 438 of cr.p.c. for anticipatory bail.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner apprehends arrest by kollam east police on an accusation of having committed a non bailable offence. he further submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence at all. learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is not made an accused by kollam east police in any case and, hence, the apprehension of the petitioner that he would be arrested has no basis. he further submits that if the petitioner is made an accused and his arrest is necessary, before the arrest, he will be served with a notice. in view of the submissions so made by the learned public prosecutor, this application does not survive. therefore, recording the submissions made by the learned public prosecutor, this application is closed. sd/- babu mathew p. joseph, judge. okb.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 7TH POUSHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 9556 of 2012 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO.55/2011 OF KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ------------------ A.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 4 YEARS, S/O ANANDAN, FLAT NO G.D., PALM SHADE, OORAMPALLIL NAGAR, MUNDAKKAL WEST, KOLLAM 69100 . BY ADV. SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN IYER RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT: -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: DSV/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, J.

--------------------------------------------- B.A. No.9556 of 2012 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of December, 2012 ORDER This application is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner apprehends arrest by Kollam East Police on an accusation of having committed a non bailable offence. He further submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence at all. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is not made an accused by Kollam East Police in any case and, hence, the apprehension of the petitioner that he would be arrested has no basis. He further submits that if the petitioner is made an accused and his arrest is necessary, before the arrest, he will be served with a notice. In view of the submissions so made by the learned Public Prosecutor, this application does not survive. Therefore, recording the submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor, this application is closed. Sd/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. okb.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial