Ashraf Vs. State of Kerala

Ashraf vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 28, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011550

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1011550
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice M.L.Joseph Francis
Decided On: Dec 28, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashraf

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....s/o.hyder, punanderveettil house rayirimangalam amsom, tanur post malappuram district. by adv. sri.u.k.devidas respondent/complainant: --------------------------- state of kerala, represented by the sub inspector of police tanur through public prosecutor high court of kerala, ernakulam. r by public prosecutor, shri n surendran this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 28-12-2012, the court on the same day passed the following: m.l.joseph francis j., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl.m.c. no.4005 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 28th day of december, 2012 order this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure is filed by the accused nos.1 to 5 in c.c. no.1015 of 2008 on the file of j.f.c.m. court, parappangadi for the offences under sections 143, 147, 353 read with section 149 of the indian penal code.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned public prosecutor.3. now investigation is over and non-bailable warrant is pending.4. since the petitioners are willing to surrender and face the trial, no purpose will be served by sending the petitioners to jail. therefore in order to secure ends of justice, the petitioners are directed to surrender before that court on or before 27.3.2013. on such surrender that court may allow the petitioners to go on bail. while releasing the petitioners on bail, that court may impose suitable conditions. the crl. m.c. is allowed to that extent. sd/ m. l. joseph francis, dl/ (judge)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 7TH POUSHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 4005 of 2012 () -------------------------- CC.1015/2008 of J.M.F.C.,MALAPPURAM CRIME NO.318/08 OF J.F.C.M., PARAPPANGADI PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 5.------------------------------- 1. ASHRAF, S/O.ABOOBACKER (LATE), THAVARAKKADAN HOUSE RAYIRIMANGALAM AMSOM, TANUR POST MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. SAKEER, S/O.HUSSAIN, CHUNDANGAPURAKKAL HOUSE, TANUR POST MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. VASUDEVAN ALIAS VASU, S/O.GOVINDAN, MANKUZHIYIL HOUSE, THANALOOR.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

4. UNNI, S/O.KUTTY APPU VAIDYAR, THIRATHAZHATHU HOUSE RAYIRIMANGALAM AMSOM, TANUR POST MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

5. FIRDOUSE, S/O.HYDER, PUNANDERVEETTIL HOUSE RAYIRIMANGALAM AMSOM, TANUR POST MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TANUR THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI N SURENDRAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS J., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.4005 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of December, 2012 ORDER This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed by the accused nos.1 to 5 in C.C. No.1015 of 2008 on the file of J.F.C.M. Court, Parappangadi for the offences under Sections 143, 147, 353 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Now investigation is over and non-bailable warrant is pending.

4. Since the petitioners are willing to surrender and face the trial, no purpose will be served by sending the petitioners to jail. Therefore in order to secure ends of justice, the petitioners are directed to surrender before that Court on or before 27.3.2013. On such surrender that Court may allow the petitioners to go on bail. While releasing the petitioners on bail, that Court may impose suitable conditions. The Crl. M.C. is allowed to that extent. Sd/ M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, dl/ (JUDGE)

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties Ashraf vs State of Kerala Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice M.L.Joseph Francis