Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajesh Vs. State of Kerala

Ajesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 28, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011540

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....finally heard on 28-12- 2012, the court on the same day passed the following: jm babu mathew p. joseph, j.------------------------------------------ b.a.no.9563 of 2012 ----------------------------------- dated this the 28th day of december, 2012 order learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawing this application. permission granted and this application is dismissed as withdrawn.2. the petitioner has earlier filed b.a.no.6988 of 2012 for bail, which was dismissed by this court by order dated 17.10.2012. but, opportunity was given to the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer on or before 03.11.2012. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not surrender before the investigating officer as directed by this court due to the reason that he was away from station. learned counsel prays for granting extension of time to the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer as directed in the earlier order. after hearing both sides, this court satisfied that extension of time prayed for should be granted. therefore, the petitioner is directed to surrender on or before 08.01.2013. other directions contained in the earlier order will apply. babu mathew p. joseph, judge. dg

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 7TH POUSHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 9563 of 2012 () ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN BA.6988/2012 DATED 17 10-2012 CRIME NO.510/2009 OF SOORANAD POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:-: -------------------- AJESH,, AGED 1 YEARS S/O.SURESH KUMAR, USHALAYAM, IDAPPANAYAM MURI SOORANAD NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR THALUK KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA ”

522. BY ADV. SRI.SOORANAD S.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM ”

031.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOORANAD POLICE STATION, PIN ”

552. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.M.SANEER THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-12- 2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jm BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, J.

------------------------------------------ B.A.No.9563 of 2012 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of December, 2012 ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawing this application. Permission granted and this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

2. The petitioner has earlier filed B.A.No.6988 of 2012 for bail, which was dismissed by this Court by order dated 17.10.2012. But, opportunity was given to the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer on or before 03.11.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not surrender before the investigating officer as directed by this Court due to the reason that he was away from station. Learned counsel prays for granting extension of time to the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer as directed in the earlier order. After hearing both sides, this Court satisfied that extension of time prayed for should be granted. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to surrender on or before 08.01.2013. Other directions contained in the earlier order will apply. BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. DG

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial