Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandran Vs. State of Kerala

Chandran vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 28, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011538

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandran

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....molathu house methala kara, asamannur village kunnathunadu taluk, ernakulam (secretary, perumbavoor range kallu chethu vyavasaya thozhilali sahakarana sangam no.e-1042) by adv. sri.nireesh mathew respondent/complainant: --------------- state of kerala rep.by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam r by public prosecutor, shri n suresh this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 28-12-2012, the court on the same day passed the following: m.l.joseph francis j., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl.m.c. no.4017 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 28th day of december, 2012 order this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure is filed by the accused in c.p.no.71 of 2012 on the file of j.f.c.m. court, perumbavoor for the offences under sections 56(b) and 57(a) of the abkari act.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned public prosecutor.3. now investigation is over and non-bailable warrant is pending.4. since the petitioners are willing to surrender and face the trial, no purpose will be served by sending the petitioners to jail. therefore in order to secure ends of justice, the petitioners are directed to surrender before that court on or before 27.3.2013. on such surrender that court may allow the petitioners to go on bail. while releasing the petitioners on bail, that court may impose suitable conditions. the crl. m.c. is allowed to that extent. m. l. joseph francis, dl/ (judge)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 7TH POUSHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 4017 of 2012 () -------------------------- CP.71/2012 of J.M.F.C.,PERUMBAVOOR PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2: ------------------------------------------------ 1. CHANDRAN, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN KIDACHIRA VEEDU, MEKKAPPALA KARA VENGOOR VILLAGE KUNNATHUNAD TALUK 2 N.N.KUNJU, AGED 5 YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN NIRAVATH MOLATHU HOUSE METHALA KARA, ASAMANNUR VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM (SECRETARY, PERUMBAVOOR RANGE KALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGAM NO.E-1042) BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: --------------- STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI N SURESH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS J., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.4017 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of December, 2012 ORDER This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed by the accused in C.P.No.71 of 2012 on the file of J.F.C.M. Court, Perumbavoor for the offences under Sections 56(b) and 57(a) of the Abkari Act.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Now investigation is over and non-bailable warrant is pending.

4. Since the petitioners are willing to surrender and face the trial, no purpose will be served by sending the petitioners to jail. Therefore in order to secure ends of justice, the petitioners are directed to surrender before that Court on or before 27.3.2013. On such surrender that Court may allow the petitioners to go on bail. While releasing the petitioners on bail, that Court may impose suitable conditions. The Crl. M.C. is allowed to that extent. M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, dl/ (JUDGE)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial