Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Walker Vs. Georgia

Walker vs Georgia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-24-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101131

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
381 U.S. 355
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Walker

Respondent

Georgia

Excerpt

walker v. georgia - 381 u.s. 355 (1965) u.s. supreme court walker v. georgia, 381 u.s. 355 (1965) 381 u.s. 355 walker v. georgia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of georgia. no. 1072. decided may 24, 1965. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 220 ga. 415, 139 s. e. 2d 278. jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii and donald l. hollowell for petitioner. lewis r. slaton and carter goode for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. hamm v. city of rock hill and lupper v. arkansas, 379 u.s. 306 . mr. justice stewart would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the supreme court of georgia for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in hamm v. city of rock hill, 379 u.s. 306, 326 . mr. justice black, mr. justice harlan, and mr. justice white would affirm the judgment of the supreme court of georgia for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in hamm v. city of rock hill, 379 u.s. 306, 318 , 322, 327. page 381 u.s. 355, 356

Full Judgment

WALKER v. GEORGIA - 381 U.S. 355 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court WALKER v. GEORGIA, 381 U.S. 355 (1965) 381 U.S. 355

WALKER v. GEORGIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.
No. 1072.
Decided May 24, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 220 Ga. 415, 139 S. E. 2d 278.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Donald L. Hollowell for petitioner.

Lewis R. Slaton and Carter Goode for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U.S. 306 .

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Georgia for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U.S. 306, 326 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U.S. 306, 318 , 322, 327.

Page 381 U.S. 355, 356



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial